Contribution of health behaviors to the association between area-level socioeconomic status and cancer mortality

被引:44
作者
Hastert, Theresa A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ruterbusch, Julie J. [1 ,2 ]
Beresford, Shirley A. A. [3 ,4 ]
Sheppard, Lianne [5 ,6 ]
White, Emily [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Karmanos Canc Inst, Populat Studies & Dispar Res Program, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cancer mortality; Socioeconomic status; Neighborhood; Screening; Smoking; Diet; Physical activity; Behavior; RESEARCH FUND/AMERICAN INSTITUTE; LIFE-STYLE; INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL; PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS; RESEARCH GUIDELINES; MULTILEVEL; ADHERENCE; RISK; INEQUALITIES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Cancer mortality is higher among residents of low-socioeconomic status (SES) areas than those of high-SES areas; however, the contribution of modifiable risk factors to this disparity is not known. We used data from 54,737 participants in the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) Study, aged 50-76 with no history of cancer at baseline (2000-2002). Of these, 1488 died of cancer over an average of 7.7 years of follow-up. Data on modifiable risk factors including body mass index (BMI), physical activity, diet, alcohol, smoking and screening were taken from baseline questionnaires. We constructed a block group-level SES index using data from the 2000 United States Census and fit Cox proportional hazards models estimating the association between area-level SES and total cancer mortality with and without control for modifiable risk factors. All statistical tests are 2-sided. Cancer mortality was 77% (95% CI: 50%, 111%) higher in the lowest-SES areas compared with the highest. Modifiable risk factors accounted for 45% (95% CI: 34%, 62%) of this association. Smoking explained the greatest proportion (29%; 95% CI: 22%, 40%) of the observed association, followed by diet (11%; 95% CI: 7%, 17%), physical activity (10%; 95% CI: 7%, 16%), screening (9%; 6%, 13%), and BMI (5%; 95% CI: 1%, 10%). Results were similar in models controlling for individual education and income. The association between area-level SES and cancer mortality is partially explained by modifiable risk factors, which could suggest the appropriate targets to reduce socioeconomic disparities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Concordance between Individual vs. Area-Level Socioeconomic Measures in an Urban Setting
    Narla, Nirmala P.
    Pardo-Crespo, Maria R.
    Beebe, Timothy J.
    Sloan, Jeff
    Yawn, Barbara
    Williams, Arthur R.
    Juhn, Young J.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2015, 26 (04) : 1157 - 1172
  • [22] Association between socioeconomic status with quality of food and level of physical activity in adolescents
    Concha-Cisternas, Yeny
    Mondaca, Antonio Gonzalez
    Rodriguez, Benjamin Oyarzun
    Orellana, Cristian Salazar
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2024, (55): : 145 - 151
  • [23] Impact of area-level socioeconomic status and accessibility to treatment on life expectancy after a cancer diagnosis in Queensland, Australia
    Kou, Kou
    Dasgupta, Paramita
    Aitken, Joanne F.
    Baade, Peter D.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 69
  • [24] Area-level socioeconomic status is positively correlated with glioblastoma incidence and prognosis in the United States
    Gorenflo, Maria P.
    Shen, Alan
    Murphy, Erin S.
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Yu, Jennifer S.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [25] Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit
    Snider, Natalie G.
    Hastert, Theresa A.
    Nair, Mrudula
    Madhav, K. C.
    Ruterbusch, Julie J.
    Schwartz, Ann G.
    Peters, Edward S.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Rozek, Laura S.
    Purrington, Kristen S.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (03) : 387 - 397
  • [26] Multilevel determinants of breast cancer survival: association with geographic remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage
    Dasgupta, Paramita
    Baade, Peter D.
    Aitken, Joanne F.
    Turrell, Gavin
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (02) : 701 - 710
  • [27] Area-level socioeconomic deprivation and mortality differentials in Thailand: results from principal component analysis and cluster analysis
    Aungkulanon, Suchunya
    Tangcharoensathien, Viroj
    Shibuya, Kenji
    Bundhamcharoen, Kanitta
    Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2017, 16
  • [28] Area-level Socioeconomic Environment and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Youth
    Clennin, Morgan N.
    Dowda, Marsha
    Sui, Xuemei
    Pate, Russell R.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (12) : 2474 - 2481
  • [29] Geographic remoteness, area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in Queensland: a multilevel analysis
    Baade, Peter D.
    Dasgupta, Paramita
    Aitken, Joanne F.
    Turrell, Gavin
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [30] Interaction of Area-Level Socioeconomic Status and UV Radiation on Melanoma Occurrence in California
    Clarke, Christina A.
    Moy, Lisa M.
    Swetter, Susan M.
    Zadnick, John
    Cockburn, Myles G.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (11) : 2727 - 2733