Bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a review

被引:30
作者
Singhal, Shashideep [1 ]
Nigar, Sofia [2 ]
Paleti, Vani [2 ]
Lane, Devin [2 ]
Duddempudi, Sushil [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, New York, NY 10034 USA
[2] Brooklyn Hosp Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Brooklyn, NY USA
关键词
bowel preparation; capsule colonoscopy; regimens; review; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1177/1756283X13504730
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is being actively evaluated as an emerging complementary or alternative procedure for evaluation of the colon. The yield of CCE is significantly dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. In addition to achieving a stool-free colon the bowel preparation protocols need to decrease bubble effect and aid propulsion of the capsule. An extensive English literature search was done using PubMed with search terms of colon capsule endoscopy, PillCam and bowel preparation. Full-length articles which met the criteria were included for review. A total of 12 studies including 1149 patients were reviewed. There was significant variability in the type of bowel preparation regimens. Large-volume (3-4 liters) polyethylene glycol (PEG) was the most widely used laxative. Lower volumes of PEG showed comparable results but larger studies are needed to determine efficacy. Sodium phosphate was used as an effective booster in most studies. Magnesium citrate and ascorbic acid are emerging as promising boosters to replace sodium phosphate when it is contraindicated. The potential benefit of prokinetics needs further evaluation. Over the past decade there has been significant improvement in the bowel preparation regimens for CCE. Further experience and studies are likely to standardize the bowel preparation regimens before CCE is adopted into routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Adler Samuel N, 2011, Therap Adv Gastroenterol, V4, P265, DOI 10.1177/1756283X11401645
[2]   Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study [J].
Eliakim, R. ;
Fireman, Z. ;
Gralnek, I. M. ;
Yassin, K. ;
Waterman, M. ;
Kopelman, Y. ;
Lachter, J. ;
Koslowsky, B. ;
Adler, S. N. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (10) :963-970
[3]   Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy [J].
Eliakim, R. ;
Yassin, K. ;
Niv, Y. ;
Metzger, Y. ;
Lachter, J. ;
Gal, E. ;
Sapoznikov, B. ;
Konikoff, F. ;
Leichtmann, G. ;
Fireman, Z. ;
Kopelman, Y. ;
Adler, S. N. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (12) :1026-1031
[4]   Video Capsule Colonoscopy: Where Will We Be in 2015? [J].
Eliakim, Rami .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 139 (05) :1468-+
[5]   The colon - the latest terrain for capsule endoscopy [J].
Fireman, Z. ;
Kopelman, Y. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (10) :895-899
[6]   Could the Colonic Capsule PillCam Colon Be Clinically Useful for Selecting Patients Who Deserve a Complete Colonoscopy?: Results of Clinical Comparison With Colonoscopy in the Perspective of Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Gay, Gerard ;
Delvaux, Michel ;
Frederic, Muriel ;
Fassler, Isaac .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 (05) :1076-1086
[7]   Electrolyte disorders following colonic cleansing for imaging studies [J].
Gutiérrez-Santiago, M ;
García-Unzueta, M ;
Amado, JA ;
González-Macías, J ;
Riancho, JA .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2006, 126 (05) :161-164
[8]   A pilot study evaluating a new low-volume colon cleansing procedure for capsule colonoscopy [J].
Hartmann, D. ;
Keuchel, M. ;
Philipper, M. ;
Gralnek, I. M. ;
Jakobs, R. ;
Hagenmueller, F. ;
Neuhaus, H. ;
Riemann, J. F. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (05) :482-486
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Hassan, C. ;
Zullo, A. ;
Winn, S. ;
Morini, S. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (05) :414-421
[10]  
Herrerías-Gutiérrez JM, 2011, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V103, P69, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082011000200004