Environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation

被引:46
作者
Beier, Paul [1 ]
de Albuquerque, Fabio Suzart [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
关键词
complementarity; conservation planning; environmental diversity; minisum; species accumulation index; surrogates; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12495
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Because many species have not been described and most species ranges have not been mapped, conservation planners often use surrogates for conservation planning, but evidence for surrogate effectiveness is weak. Surrogates are well-mapped features such as soil types, landforms, occurrences of an easily observed taxon (discrete surrogates), and well-mapped environmental conditions (continuous surrogate). In the context of reserve selection, the idea is that a set of sites selected to span diversity in the surrogate will efficiently represent most species. Environmental diversity (ED) is a rarely used surrogate that selects sites to efficiently span multivariate ordination space. Because it selects across continuous environmental space, ED should perform better than discrete surrogates (which necessarily ignore within-bin and between-bin heterogeneity). Despite this theoretical advantage, ED appears to have performed poorly in previous tests of its ability to identify 50 x 50 km cells that represented vertebrates in Western Europe. Using an improved implementation of ED, we retested ED on Western European birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and combined terrestrial vertebrates. We also tested ED on data sets for plants of Zimbabwe, birds of Spain, and birds of Arizona (United States). Sites selected using ED represented European mammals no better than randomly selected cells, but they represented species in the other 7 data sets with 20% to 84% effectiveness. This far exceeds the performance in previous tests of ED, and exceeds the performance of most discrete surrogates. We believe ED performed poorly in previous tests because those tests considered only a few candidate explanatory variables and used suboptimal forms of ED's selection algorithm. We suggest future work on ED focus on analyses at finer grain sizes more relevant to conservation decisions, explore the effect of selecting the explanatory variables most associated with species turnover, and investigate whether nonclimate abiotic variables can provide useful surrogates in an ED framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1410
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NAT INV TERR SPEC BR
[2]  
[Anonymous], TD5NWRCR AT T LAB RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], CONSERVATION BIOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONSERVATIO IN PRESS
[5]   Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Humphries, CJ ;
Densham, PJ ;
Lampinen, R ;
Hagemeijer, WJM ;
Mitchell-Jones, AJ ;
Gasc, JP .
ECOGRAPHY, 2001, 24 (01) :103-110
[6]   Use of Land Facets to Plan for Climate Change: Conserving the Arenas, Not the Actors [J].
Beier, Paul ;
Brost, Brian .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) :701-710
[7]   The impact of modelling choices in the predictive performance of richness maps derived from species-distribution models: guidelines to build better diversity models [J].
Benito, Blas M. ;
Cayuela, Luis ;
Albuquerque, Fabio S. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 4 (04) :327-335
[8]   NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF CHANGES IN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
CLARKE, KR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :117-143
[9]  
Corman T. E., 2005, The Arizona breeding bird atlas, P136
[10]   Gradient forests: calculating importance gradients on physical predictors [J].
Ellis, Nick ;
Smith, Stephen J. ;
Pitcher, C. Roland .
ECOLOGY, 2012, 93 (01) :156-168