Evaluation of immunity against rubella in Iranian after mass campaign for measles-rubella vaccination on December 2003

被引:14
作者
Hamkar, Rasool [1 ]
Jalilvand, Somayeh
Mokhtari-Azad, Talat
Jelyani, Keramat Nouri
Nategh, Rakhshandeh
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Virol, Tehran 14155, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2005.11.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Prevention of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) is the main goal of rubella immunization. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that countries undertaking measles elimination should take the opportunity to eliminate rubella as well through use of measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in their childhood immunization programs and campaigns. On December 2003, during a mass campaign for measles-rubella vaccination in Iran, more than 33 million doses of vaccine were administered to 5- to 25-year-old males and females. Methods: in this study immunoglobulin (Ig)G avidity assay was used to evaluate the rubella vaccine produced immunity among susceptible populations. Results: Findings indicated that 61.9% of vaccinees (1202 out of 1940) were immune against rubella before vaccination, and 38.1% (738 out of 1940) were susceptible to rubella before vaccination. Our results also showed that 98% of the susceptible group (723 out of 738) acquired immunity against rubella after vaccination, and 2% of them (15 out of 738) did not acquire vaccine-induced immunity to rubella. Conclusion: Findings revealed that mass vaccination in December 2003 provided appropriate immune coverage among vaccinees. Also, rubella vaccine induced favorable immunity in a part of the childbearing age female (15-25 years) population, which could prevent congenital rubella syndrome among those females.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 592
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BEST JM, 2000, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P387
[2]   Avidity of IgG antibodies distinguishes primary from non-primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women [J].
Bodeus, M ;
Feyder, S ;
Goubau, P .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC VIROLOGY, 1998, 9 (01) :9-16
[3]   Maturation of rubella IgG avidity over time after acute rubella infection [J].
Bottiger, B ;
Jensen, IP .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC VIROLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) :105-111
[4]  
Cutts FT, 1997, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V75, P55
[5]  
Doroudohi M., 2001, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V7, P128
[6]  
EFTEKHARARDEBIL.H, 2002, J SCH PUBLIC HLTH I, V1, P1
[7]  
Ganjooie TA, 2003, SAUDI MED J, V24, P1270
[8]   Assessment of IgM enzyme immunoassay and IgG avidity assay for distinguishing between primary and secondary immune response to rubella vaccine [J].
Hamkar, R ;
Jalilvand, S ;
Mokhtari-Azad, T ;
Jelyani, KN ;
Dahi-Far, H ;
Soleimanjahi, H ;
Nategh, R .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 130 (1-2) :59-65
[9]  
Hollander M., 1999, NONPARAMETRIC STAT M, P202
[10]   A new method with general diagnostic utility for the calculation of immunoglobulin G avidity [J].
Korhonen, MH ;
Brunstein, J ;
Haario, H ;
Katnikov, A ;
Rescaldani, R ;
Hedman, K .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 6 (05) :725-728