Optimization of process parameters of friction stir welded AA 5083-O aluminum alloy using Response Surface Methodology

被引:14
作者
Jannet, S. [1 ]
Mathews, P. Koshy [2 ]
Raja, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karunya Univ, Dept Mech, Coimbatore 641114, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Kalaivani Coll Technol, Coimbatore 641105, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
friction stir welding; optimization; Response Surface Analysis; Analysis of Variance; tensile strength;
D O I
10.1515/bpasts-2015-0097
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A methodology was exhibited to create the experimental model for assessing the Ultimate Tensile Strength of AA 5083-O aluminum compound which is broadly utilized as a part of boat building industry by Friction Stir Welding (FSW). FSW process parameters, such as: tool rotational speed, welding speed, and axial force were optimized for better results. FSW was completed considering three-component 3-level Box Behnekn Design. Response surface Methodology (RSM) was implemented to obtain the relationship between the FSW process parameters and ultimate Tensile Strength. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) procedure was utilized to check the aptness of the created model. The FSW process parameters were additionally streamlined utilizing Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to augment tensile strength. The joint welded at a rotational speed of 1100 rpm, a welding speed of 75 mm/min and a pivotal energy of 2.5 t displays higher tensile strength compared with different joints in comparison with other joints.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 855
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Developing mathematical models to predict tensile properties of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded Ti-6Al-4V alloy [J].
Balasubramanian, M. ;
Jayabalan, V. ;
Balasubramanian, V. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2008, 29 (01) :92-97
[2]   Friction stir welding characteristics of different heat-treated-state 2219 aluminum alloy plates [J].
Chen, YC ;
Liu, HJ ;
Feng, JC .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2006, 420 (1-2) :21-25
[3]  
Colligan J., 2003, WELD J, V82, P1
[4]   Material flow and mechanical behaviour of dissimilar AA2024-T3 and AA7075-T6 aluminium alloys friction stir welds [J].
da Silva, A. A. M. ;
Arruti, E. ;
Janeiro, G. ;
Aldanondo, E. ;
Alvarez, P. ;
Echeverria, A. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011, 32 (04) :2021-2027
[5]   Influences of tool pin profile and axial force on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy [J].
Elangovan, K. ;
Balasubramanian, V. ;
Valliappan, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 38 (3-4) :285-295
[6]   The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni-Co-Mo surfaced layers [J].
Grum, J ;
Slabe, JM .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 155 :2026-2032
[7]   Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged are welding of pipes [J].
Gunaraj, V ;
Murugan, N .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 88 (1-3) :266-275
[8]   Predictions of the optimized friction stir spot welding process parameters for joining AA2024 aluminum alloy using RSM [J].
Karthikeyan, R. ;
Balasubramanian, V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 51 (1-4) :173-183
[9]   Friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys AA2219 to AA5083-Optimization of process parameters using Taguchi technique [J].
Koilraj, M. ;
Sundareswaran, V. ;
Vijayan, S. ;
Rao, S. R. Koteswara .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2012, 42 :1-7
[10]   Analysis of high temperature plastic behaviour and its relation with weldability in friction stir welding for aluminium alloys AA5083-H111 and AA6082-T6 [J].
Leitao, C. ;
Louro, R. ;
Rodrigues, D. M. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2012, 37 :402-409