Bistable states and separation hysteresis in curved compression ramp flows

被引:10
作者
Hu, Yan-Chao [1 ]
Zhou, Wen-Feng [1 ]
Wang, Gang [1 ]
Yang, Yan-Guang [2 ]
Tang, Zhi-Gong [2 ]
机构
[1] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Hyperveloc Aerodynam Inst, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; SHOCK-WAVE REFLECTIONS; LAMINAR SEPARATION; MACH REFLECTION; STEADY FLOWS; TRANSITION; RECONSIDERATION; INSTABILITY;
D O I
10.1063/5.0029150
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The separation hysteresis of the boundary layer induced by the variation of the angle of attack (AOA) is observed and investigated numerically in curved compression ramp (CCR) flows. The occurrence of this new phenomenon is based on the bistable states of CCR flows even for the same free-stream and boundary conditions, indicating that the boundary layer's state (attachment/separation) depends on its evolutionary history with AOA varying. Specifically, beginning with an attachment state, the boundary layer remains attached as AOA increases slowly and suddenly separates once AOA reaches a marginal angle alpha (s). However, if we decrease AOA back from this angle, the boundary layer will not attach and remain separated until AOA reaches a small enough angle alpha (a). The AOA extent [alpha (a), alpha (s)] is called the dual-solution region. Three characteristic adverse pressure gradients (APGs), I-sb, I-cw, and I-b, are proposed to explain the existence of this dual-solution region, where I-cw and I-sb (I-cw < I-sb) are induced by the curved wall and the separation bubble, respectively, and I-b is the maximum APG that the boundary layer can resist. (i) When I-b > I-sb, the flow must be attached, (ii) when I-b < I-cw, the flow must be separated, and (iii) when I-cw < I-b < I-sb, both of these two states are theoretically possible. Since AOA-variation can make (i), (ii), and (iii) occur alternately, it could induce the separation hysteresis of CCR flows, which has been observed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Direct simulation of the turbulent boundary layer along a compression ramp at M=3 and Reθ=1685 [J].
Adams, NA .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2000, 420 :47-83
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ED Manag, V28, pS1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SHOCK WAVE BOUNDARY
[4]   HYSTERESIS EFFECTS ON WIND-TUNNEL MEASUREMENTS OF A 2-ELEMENT AIRFOIL [J].
BIBER, K ;
ZUMWALT, GW .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1993, 31 (02) :326-330
[5]   EFFECT OF MEAN COMPRESSION OR DILATATION ON TURBULENCE STRUCTURE OF SUPERSONIC BOUNDARY-LAYERS [J].
BRADSHAW, P .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1974, 63 (APR29) :449-464
[6]  
Chapman D. R., 1958, NACA Report No. 1356
[7]   Numerical confirmation of the hysteresis phenomenon in the regular to the Mach reflection transition in steady flows [J].
Chpoun, A ;
BenDor, G .
SHOCK WAVES, 1995, 5 (04) :199-203
[8]   RECONSIDERATION OF OBLIQUE SHOCK-WAVE REFLECTIONS IN STEADY FLOWS .1. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION [J].
CHPOUN, A ;
PASSEREL, D ;
LI, H ;
BENDOR, G .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1995, 301 :19-35
[9]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492
[10]  
Cousteix J., 1988, LIMITE LAMINAIRE