Evaluation as advocacy

被引：71
作者：
Greene, JC
机构：
来源：
EVALUATION PRACTICE | 1997年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90005-2
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
The argument advanced in this article is that advocacy in evaluation is inevitable. This is so when advocacy is understood not as program partisanship or contaminating bias, but rather as a value commitment to a particular regulative ideal (of rational decision making, interpretive meaning, community activism). The regulative ideal for evaluation advanced in this discussion is a commitment to democratic pluralism. These ideas are illustrated and substantiated with three case examples.
引用
收藏
页码：25 / 35
页数：11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, UTILIZATION FOCUSED
[3]   WHOSE SIDE ARE WE ON [J].
BECKER, HS .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1967, 14 (03) :239-247
[4]   DOING GOOD OR WORSE - EVALUATION RESEARCH POLITICALLY REEXAMINED [J].
BERK, RA ;
ROSSI, PH .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1976, 23 (03) :337-349
[5]  
Bernstein R.J., 1983, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis
[6]  
CAMPBELL DT, 1971, ANN M AM PSYCH ASS W
[7]  
Fetterman D., 1994, Evaluation Practice, V15, P1, DOI [10.1177/109821409401500101, DOI 10.1016/0886-1633(94)90055-8]
[8]  
Guba E.G., 1989, 4 GENERATION EVALUAT
[9]  
HAHN AJ, 1994, ED PUBLIC ISSUES
[10]  
Heshusuis L., 1994, EDUC RESEARCHER, V23, P15, DOI [10.3102/0013189X023003015, DOI 10.3102/0013189X023003015]
123