Switchgrass Biomass Quality as Affected by Nitrogen Rate, Harvest Time, and Storage

被引:15
作者
Ibrahim, Mostafa [1 ]
Hong, Chang Oh [2 ]
Singh, Shikha [1 ]
Kumar, Sandeep [1 ]
Osborne, Shannon [3 ]
Owens, Vance [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Life Sci & Environm Biochem, Miryang 50463, South Korea
[3] USDA ARS, North Cent Ag Res Lab, 2923 Medary Ave, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
[4] South Dakota State Univ, North Cent Reg Sun Grant Ctr, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
关键词
BIG BLUESTEM; YIELD; MISCANTHUS; MANAGEMENT; GRASSES; MANURE; CROPS; US;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2016.07.0380
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the changes in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) biomass quality as affected by N rate, harvest time, and storage. This research was conducted near Bristol, SD, in 2010 and 2011. Treatments included three N rates (0, 56, and 112 kg N ha(-1)) applied annually and each N rate replicated four times. Aft er a killing frost, all of the plots were harvested and baled in large round bales in October 2010 and November 2011. An area of about 30 m(2) from each plot was left unharvested to represent storage of standing switchgrass over the winter and to , cellulose, lignin, mineral elements, N, and C. In the first season, storadetermine dry matter yields. Switchgrass was analyzed for hemicellulosege of the fall harvested switchgrass bales numerically increased the concentrations of hemicellulose, lignin, and N. In the second season, they increased significantly. Mineral elements significantly increased in both sampling seasons. Delaying harvest until spring decreased lignin, N, and mineral elements concentration, and increased cellulose and hemicellulose concentrations, but also reduced biomass yield. Results from this study suggest that delaying the switchgrass harvest until spring increased the overall feedstock quality for ethanol production, but yield reductions must be considered to determine the overall economic impact of a delayed harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Nelson D. W., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P961
  • [32] The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels
    Parrish, DJ
    Fike, JH
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (5-6) : 423 - 459
  • [33] Quattrocchi U, 2006, CRC WORLD DICT GRASS, DOI [10.1201/9781420003222, DOI 10.1201/9781420003222]
  • [34] Nitrogen removal in switchgrass biomass under two harvest systems
    Reynolds, JH
    Walker, CL
    Kirchner, MJ
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 19 (05) : 281 - 286
  • [35] Response of Switchgrass Yield and Quality to Harvest Season and Nitrogen Fertilizer
    Sadeghpour, A.
    Gorlitsky, L. E.
    Hashemi, M.
    Weis, S. A.
    Herbert, S. J.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (01) : 290 - 296
  • [36] SWITCHGRASS BIOMASS COMPOSITION DURING MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN DIVERSE ENVIRONMENTS
    SANDERSON, MA
    WOLF, DD
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1995, 35 (05) : 1432 - 1438
  • [37] SAS Institute, 2011, SAS STAT 9 3 USERS G
  • [38] Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy
    Schmer, M. R.
    Liebig, M. A.
    Vogel, K. P.
    Mitchell, R. B.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2011, 3 (06): : 439 - 448
  • [39] Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review
    Sun, Y
    Cheng, JY
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 83 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [40] Biomass Yield and Quality of Reed Canarygrass under Five Harvest Management Systems for Bioenergy Production
    Tahir, M. Hammad Nadeem
    Casler, Michael D.
    Moore, Kenneth J.
    Brummer, E. Charles
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (02) : 111 - 119