Lottery- and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task

被引:26
作者
Attanasi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Georgantzis, Nikolaos [2 ,3 ]
Rotondi, Valentina [4 ]
Vigani, Daria [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille 1, LEM, F-59655 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[2] Burgundy Sch Wine & Spirits Business, Dijon, France
[3] Univ Reading, Reading, Berks, England
[4] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Risk aversion; Elicitation methods; Lottery choices; ASPIRATION LEVEL; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; AVERSION; PREFERENCES; CHOICE; MODEL; CONSEQUENCES; DETERMINANTS; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11238-017-9613-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze the results from three different risk attitude elicitation methods. First, the broadly used test by Holt and Laury (2002), HL, second, the lottery-panel task by Sabater-Grande and Georgantzis (2002), SG, and third, responses to a survey question on self-assessment of general attitude towards risk (Dohmen et al. 2011). The first and the second task are implemented with real monetary incentives, while the third concerns all domains in life in general. Like in previous studies, the correlation of decisions across tasks is low and usually statistically non-significant. However, when we consider only subjects whose behavior across the panels of the SG task is compatible with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA), the correlation between HL and self-assessed risk attitude becomes significant. Furthermore, the correlation between HL and SG also increases for CRRA-compatible subjects, although it remains statistically non-significant.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 372
页数:32
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006)
    Andersen, Steffen
    Harrison, Glenn W.
    Lau, Morten Igel
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) : 99 - 100
  • [2] [Anonymous], AMBIGUITY
  • [3] Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study
    Attanasi, Giuseppe
    Gollier, Christian
    Montesano, Aldo
    Pace, Noemi
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2014, 77 (04) : 485 - 530
  • [4] RISK AVERSION, OVERCONFIDENCE AND PRIVATE INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF MAJORITY THRESHOLDS
    Attanasi, Giuseppe
    Corazzini, Luca
    Georgantzis, Nikolaos
    Passarelli, Francesco
    [J]. PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 19 (03) : 355 - 386
  • [5] Cultural investment, local development and instantaneous social capital: A case study of a gathering festival in the South of Italy
    Attanasi, Giuseppe
    Casoria, Fortuna
    Centorrino, Samuele
    Urso, Giulia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS, 2013, 47 : 228 - 247
  • [6] Reference dependent preferences, hedonic adaptation and tax evasion: Does the tax burden matter?
    Bernasconi, Michele
    Corazzini, Luca
    Seri, Raffaello
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 40 : 103 - 118
  • [7] Math skills and risk attitudes
    Branas-Garza, Pablo
    Guillen, Pablo
    Lopez del Paso, Rafael
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 99 (02) : 332 - 336
  • [8] Aspirational Preferences and Their Representation by Risk Measures
    Brown, David B.
    De Giorgi, Enrico
    Sim, Melvyn
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (11) : 2095 - 2113
  • [9] Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon
    Butler, David J.
    Loomes, Graham C.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (01) : 277 - 297
  • [10] Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time
    Camerer, C
    Babcock, L
    Loewenstein, G
    Thaler, R
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 407 - 441