TRUST AND INNOVATION NEXUS AMONG THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES

被引:0
作者
Basic, Maja [1 ]
Josic, Hrvoje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Econ & Business, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ECONOMY OF EASTERN CROATIA - VISION AND GROWTH | 2019年
关键词
Collaboration for Innovation; Innovation Ecosystem; Trust; Community Innovation Survey; International Competitiveness; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
European Innovation Scoreboard uses data from the Eurostat's Community innovation survey to determine the state of the European Union's innovation and benchmark it with the rest of the world. European Union member states differ in their innovation performance across the variety of indicators. In the fast-paced global environment, innovation is important because it results in products and services of higher added value and leads to greater international competitiveness. Open innovation approach results in an increase in the speed of innovation and innovation performance. While the share of firms adopting open innovation is rising and inbound open innovation is a predominant mode of open innovation used, there is a stagnation in the intensity of collaboration for innovation purposes. This paper examines the role of trust in collaboration for innovation purposes between the European Union member states. Trust is important in collaboration because it decreases transaction costs, facilitates the flow of information, and cooperation accordingly, and enables a more efficient economic environment. Moreover, this study analyses the role of trust within different innovation ecosystems of the European Union member states. Its aim is to explain whether differences in trust can explain differences in collaboration for innovation purposes and innovation ecosystems between European Union member states. This study uses country data for the 28 European Union member states in the period 2010-2017. World Bank's Worldwide Governance Indicators' item Rule of law is used as a proxy for trust, while the Eurostat's Community Innovation Survey's indicators on linkages, research systems, innovation friendly environment, and finance and support are used as proxies for collaboration for innovation and innovation ecosystem. The analysis is meaningful from a policy perspective in the aspect of an increasing international competitiveness through a decrease in transaction costs in both public and private sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 582
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Tolerance and innovation: the role of institutional and social trust
    Audretsch, David B.
    Seitz, Nikolaus
    Rouch, Katherine Margaret
    [J]. EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 8 (01) : 71 - 92
  • [2] Societal trust and open innovation
    Brockman, Paul
    Khurana, Inder K.
    Zhong, Rong
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (10) : 2048 - 2065
  • [3] Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions
    Cooke, P
    Uranga, MG
    Etxebarria, G
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (4-5) : 475 - 491
  • [4] ASSESSING THE OPEN INNOVATION TRENDS BY MEANS OF THE EUROSTAT COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEY
    Cricelli, Livio
    Greco, Marco
    Grimaldi, Michele
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (03)
  • [5] Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study
    Dakhli, M
    De Clercq, D
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 16 (02) : 107 - 128
  • [6] The Institutional Arrangements of Innovation: Antecedents and Performance Effects of Trust in High-Tech Alliances
    De Jong, Gjalt
    Woolthuis, Rosalinde Klein
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2008, 15 (01) : 45 - 67
  • [7] The role of trust in innovation
    Dovey, Ken
    [J]. LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2009, 16 (04) : 311 - +
  • [8] Eurostat, 2018, EUR INN SCOR DAT 201
  • [9] Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation
    Fawcett, Stanley E.
    Jones, Stephen L.
    Fawcett, Amydee M.
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2012, 55 (02) : 163 - 178
  • [10] An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance
    Greco, Marco
    Grimaldi, Michele
    Cricelli, Livio
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 34 (05) : 501 - 516