A multi-objective differential evolution approach based on ε-elimination uniform-diversity for mechanism design

被引:11
作者
Gholaminezhad, I. [1 ]
Jamali, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guilan, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Rasht, Iran
关键词
Differential evolution; MUDE; Mechanism; Artificial intelligence; Optimum design; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-015-1275-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, a new multi-objective uniform-diversity differential evolution (MUDE) algorithm is proposed and used for Pareto optimum design of mechanisms. The proposed algorithm uses a diversity preserving mechanism called the epsilon-elimination algorithm to improve the population diversity among the obtained Pareto front. The proposed algorithm is firstly tested on some constrained and unconstrained benchmarks proposed for the special session and competition on multi-objective optimizers held under IEEE CEC 2009. The inverted generational distance (IGD) measure is used to assess the performance of the algorithm. Secondly, the proposed algorithm has been used for multi-objective optimization of two different combinatorial case studies. The first case contains a two-degree of freedom leg mechanism with springs. Three conflicting objective functions that have been considered for Pareto optimization are namely, leg size, vertical actuating force, and the peak crank torque. The second case is a two-finger robot gripper mechanism with two conflicting objectives which are the difference between the maximum and minimum-gripping force and the transmission ratio of actuated and experienced gripper forces. Comparisons of obtained Pareto fronts using the method of this work with those obtained in other references show significant improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 877
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Pareto optimal synthesis of four-bar mechanisms for path generation [J].
Nariman-Zadeh, N. ;
Felezi, M. ;
Jamali, A. ;
Ganji, M. .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2009, 44 (01) :180-191
[32]   Pareto optimization of a five-degree of freedom vehicle vibration model using a multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithm (MUGA) [J].
Nariman-Zadeh, N. ;
Salehpour, M. ;
Jamali, A. ;
Haghgoo, E. .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 23 (04) :543-551
[33]  
Osyczka A., 2002, Evolutionary Algorithms for Single and Multicriteria Design Optimization
[34]  
Pham D.T., 1986, ROBOT GRIPPERS
[35]  
Potter RD, 1985, HDB IND ROBOTICS, P775
[36]   Multi-objective Evolutionary Programming without Non-domination Sorting is up to Twenty Times Faster [J].
Qu, B. Y. ;
Suganthan, P. N. .
2009 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-5, 2009, :2934-2939
[37]   Multiobjective optimization of a leg mechanism with various spring configurations for force reduction [J].
Shieh, SB ;
Tsai, LW ;
Azarm, S ;
Tits, AL .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1996, 118 (02) :179-185
[38]  
Shieh W., 1994, ADV DESIGN AUTOMATIO, V69-1, P199
[39]   AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT QUADRUPED WITH 2-STAGE EQUILIBRATOR [J].
SHIN, E ;
STREIT, DA .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1993, 115 (01) :156-163
[40]   Local Search Based Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm for Constrained and Unconstrained Problems [J].
Sindhya, Karthik ;
Sinha, Ankur ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Miettinen, Kaisa .
2009 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-5, 2009, :2919-+