Safety Profile and Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Stand-Alone 2-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Series of 41 Consecutive Patients

被引:1
作者
Kashlan, Osama [1 ]
Frerich, Jason M. [2 ]
Malcolm, James G. [2 ]
Gary, Matthew F. [3 ]
Rodts, Gerald E. [2 ]
Refai, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Neurosurg, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Orthoped Surg, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; fusion; interbody fusion; lumbar spine; multilevel fusion; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; RETROGRADE EJACULATION; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; ARTHRODESIS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.11684
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The use of stand-alone 2-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for degenerative lumbar disease has been increasing as an alternative to routinely augmenting these constructs with posterior fixation or fusion. Despite the potential benefits of a stand-alone approach (decreased cost and operative time, decreased pain and early mobilization), there is a paucity of information regarding these operations in the literature. This investigation aimed to determine the safety profile, radiographic outcomes including fusion rates, improvement in preoperative pain, and spinopelvic parameter modification, for patients undergoing stand-alone 2-level ALIF. Methods: This retrospective case series involved a chart review of all patients undergoing 2-level standalone ALIF at a single tertiary hospital from 2008 to 2018. Data included patient demographics, hospitalization, complications and radiological studies. Visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg scores were measured via patient-administered surveys preoperatively and up to 18 weeks postoperatively. Results: Forty-one patients who underwent L4-S1 stand-alone ALIF were included. Sixteen (39%) of patients had undergone previous posterior lumbar surgery. Length of stay averaged 4.2 days. Complication rates were comparable to 1-level ALIF. Two patients required reoperation. Fusion rates were 100% for L4-5 and 94.4% for L5-S1. There was no significant change in lumbar lordosis (LL) or LL-pelvic incidence (PI), but there was improved segmental lordosis (SL) and disc height at L4-S1 on final follow-up imaging. There was also modest but statistically significant improvement in VAS back and leg scores. Conclusions: Stand-alone 2-level ALIF is an option for a surgeon to perform in the absence of significant instability, even in the setting of prior posterior surgery. These procedures increase SL and disc height, but do not have the same effect on LL or LL-PI.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Anterior lumbar sagittal alignment after anterior or lateral interbody fusion [J].
Afathi, M. ;
Zairi, F. ;
Devos, P. ;
Allaoui, M. ;
Marinho, P. ;
Chopin, D. ;
Assaker, R. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (08) :1245-1250
[2]   Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ajiboye, Remi M. ;
Alas, Haddy ;
Mosich, Gina M. ;
Sharma, Akshay ;
Pourtaheri, Sina .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (04) :E230-E238
[3]   Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Aoki, Yasuchika ;
Nakajima, Arata ;
Takahashi, Hiroshi ;
Sonobe, Masato ;
Terajima, Fumiaki ;
Saito, Masahiko ;
Takahashi, Kazuhisa ;
Ohtori, Seiji ;
Watanabe, Atsuya ;
Nakajima, Takayuki ;
Takazawa, Makoto ;
Orita, Sumihisa ;
Eguchi, Yawara ;
Nakagawa, Koichi .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
[4]   Anterior lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated complications [J].
Bateman, Dexter K. ;
Millhouse, Paul W. ;
Shahi, Niti ;
Kadam, Abhijeet B. ;
Maltenfort, Mitchell G. ;
Koerner, John D. ;
Vaccaro, Alexander R. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05) :1118-1132
[5]   Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2: a cohort controlled study [J].
Carragee, Eugene J. ;
Mitsunaga, Kyle A. ;
Hurwitz, Eric L. ;
Scuderi, Gaetano J. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (06) :511-516
[6]   Evaluating Outcomes of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review [J].
Giang, Gloria ;
Mobbs, Ralph ;
Phan, Steven ;
Tran, Tommy Manh ;
Phan, Kevin .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 104 :259-271
[7]   Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database [J].
Goz, Vadim ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey H. ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Errico, Thomas J. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (09) :2019-2027
[8]   Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery [J].
Hofstetter, Christoph P. ;
Hofer, Anna S. ;
Levi, Allan D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) :457-475
[9]   Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance [J].
Hsieh, Patrick C. ;
Koski, Tyler R. ;
O'Shaughnessy, Brian A. ;
Sugrue, Patrick ;
Salehi, Sean ;
Ondra, Stephen ;
Liu, John C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (04) :379-386
[10]   Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Oblique Self-anchored Stand-alone Cages for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation A Retrospective Study With 2-year Follow-up [J].
Kuang, Lei ;
Wang, Bing ;
Lu, Guohua .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (21) :E1259-E1265