Effect of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on velopharyngeal function: A pilot study

被引:51
|
作者
Harada, K
Ishii, Y
Ishii, M
Imaizumi, H
Mibu, M
Omura, K
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch, Branch Oral Surg, Dept Oral Restitut,Div Oral Hlth Sci,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138549, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dent Hosp, Clin Stomatognath Dysfunct, Tokyo 1138549, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2002.123827
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine preoperative and postoperative changes of velopharyngeal function in cleft patients who underwent maxillary distraction osteogenesis using the Rigid External Distraction System. Study design. Six cleft patients followed for a minimum of 12 months after maxillary distraction were examined. Plain and contrast lateral-cephalograms were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, and speech evaluation was performed by the same authorized speech therapist at the same time points. Results. The mean distraction amount at the anterior nasal spine was 11.7 mm (range, 7.4 mm - 15.0 mm). Both the nasopharyngeal depth and velar length increased after maxillary distraction, but the need ratio (nasopharyngeal depth/velar length) also increased after distraction. Although scores for velopharyngeal closure dropped a few points after maxillary distraction, the rating for hypernasality remained unchanged in all patients but the patient whose distraction amount was 15.0 mm. Conclusion. These results suggest that maxillary distraction of less than 15 mm may not markedly affect velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 543
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Midface and maxillary distraction osteogenesis: development of an internal modular distraction system
    Cohen, SR
    INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1997, : 289 - 301
  • [22] Breakage of internal maxillary distractor: considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Aikawa, Tomonao
    Iida, Seiji
    Isomura, Emiko T.
    Namikawa, Mari
    Matsuoka, Yudai
    Yamada, Chiaki
    Yamamoto, Taku
    Takigawa, Yoko
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2008, 106 (01): : E1 - E7
  • [23] The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: A critical review
    Chanchareonsook, Nattharee
    Samman, Nabil
    Whitehill, Tara L.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (04): : 477 - 487
  • [24] VELOPHARYNGEAL FUNCTION FOLLOWING MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT
    MCCARTHY, JG
    COCCARO, PJ
    SCHWARTZ, MD
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1979, 64 (02) : 180 - 189
  • [25] Changes in nasorespiratory function in association with maxillary distraction osteogenesis in subjects with cleft lip and palate
    Saito, K
    Ono, T
    Mochida, M
    Ohyama, K
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2006, 43 (01): : 75 - 83
  • [27] Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function
    Chua, H. D. P.
    Whitehill, T. L.
    Samman, N.
    Cheung, L. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (07) : 633 - 640
  • [28] Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: Distraction osteogenesis, versus orthognathic surgery - Part one: Maxillary distraction
    Rachmiel, Adi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (04) : 753 - 757
  • [29] PRECISION IN PERFORMING DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS MAXILLARY EXPANSION FOR OSA
    Abdelwahab, M.
    Ibrahim, B.
    Huang, A.
    Yoon, A.
    Chou, C.
    Liu, S.
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2022, 100 : S268 - S268
  • [30] Longitudinal cephalometric analysis after maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Krimmel, M
    Cornelius, CP
    Bacher, M
    Gülicher, D
    Reinert, S
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 683 - 688