Effect of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on velopharyngeal function: A pilot study

被引:51
|
作者
Harada, K
Ishii, Y
Ishii, M
Imaizumi, H
Mibu, M
Omura, K
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch, Branch Oral Surg, Dept Oral Restitut,Div Oral Hlth Sci,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138549, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dent Hosp, Clin Stomatognath Dysfunct, Tokyo 1138549, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2002.123827
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine preoperative and postoperative changes of velopharyngeal function in cleft patients who underwent maxillary distraction osteogenesis using the Rigid External Distraction System. Study design. Six cleft patients followed for a minimum of 12 months after maxillary distraction were examined. Plain and contrast lateral-cephalograms were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively, and speech evaluation was performed by the same authorized speech therapist at the same time points. Results. The mean distraction amount at the anterior nasal spine was 11.7 mm (range, 7.4 mm - 15.0 mm). Both the nasopharyngeal depth and velar length increased after maxillary distraction, but the need ratio (nasopharyngeal depth/velar length) also increased after distraction. Although scores for velopharyngeal closure dropped a few points after maxillary distraction, the rating for hypernasality remained unchanged in all patients but the patient whose distraction amount was 15.0 mm. Conclusion. These results suggest that maxillary distraction of less than 15 mm may not markedly affect velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 543
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Cleft Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis on the Levator Veli Palatini and Velopharyngeal Function
    Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
    Por, Yong-Chen
    Liou, Eric Jein-Wein
    Chang, Frank Chun-Shin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (03) : 687 - 690
  • [2] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Effects on articulation and velopharyngeal function
    Guyette, TW
    Polley, JW
    Figueroa, AA
    Cohen, MN
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 7 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [3] Helical distraction is superior to linear distraction in maxillary distraction osteogenesis: an in silico study
    Gateno, J.
    Kim, D.
    Bartlett, S.
    Gonzalez, C.
    Xu, J.
    Xia, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (09) : 971 - 980
  • [4] Maxillary intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 381 - 387
  • [5] Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: Comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis - Early results
    Chanchareonsook, Nattharee
    Whitehill, Tara L.
    Samman, Nabil
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2007, 44 (01): : 23 - 32
  • [6] Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Kunkel, Ryan
    Kim, Erinn
    Tuncer, Fatma Betul
    Siddiqi, Faizi
    Gociman, Barbu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : 2530 - 2532
  • [7] Patient With Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia Who Underwent Distraction Osteogenesis and Conservative Therapies to Postoperative Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
    Takahashi, Katsu
    Dahy, Khaled Gamal
    Saito, Kazuyuki
    Masuoka, Hiromu
    Suzuki, Shigehiko
    Bessho, Kazuhisa
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (05) : 1302 - 1304
  • [8] PARACRINE REGULATORS IN DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS (pilot study)
    Stogov, M. V.
    Emanov, A. A.
    Kireeva, E. A.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2016, 22 (02): : 64 - 69
  • [9] Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Uckan, Sina
    Arman, Ayca
    Bayram, Burak
    Celik, Erkan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 17 (05) : 992 - 997
  • [10] A Minipig Model of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis
    Papadaki, Maria E.
    Troulis, Maria J.
    Glowacki, Julie
    Kaban, Leonard B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (11) : 2783 - 2791