The power of detention in the management of non-compliance with tuberculosis treatment: A survey of Irish practitioners and analysis of potential legal liability

被引:6
作者
Duffy, S. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radcliffes Brasseur, London SW1P 3SJ, England
关键词
Public health powers; Tuberculosis; Detention; Compliance; Human rights; PUBLIC-HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2008.09.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The detention of patients infected with tuberculosis has recently been the subject of significant professional and public interest. In Ireland, the power to detain and isolate probable sources of infectious disease is found in the Health Act 1947. The objective of this study was to describe the use of the power to detain, and to examine relevant legal implications. Study design: Cohort Survey. Methods: Respiratory and infectious disease physicians practising in the public sector were invited to complete a self-administered postal questionnaire. Results: Of the 44 clinicians surveyed, 33 responded, representing a total of 356 years of specialist practice (mean 10.8 years). Although 70% of respondents had made use of threats of formal detention in dealing with non-compliant patients, only one formal detention tinder statutory powers was identified. Infrastructural and legal concerns with the use of detention were common. There was widespread support for a broadening of the range of additional public health powers, including a power of prolonged detention in the setting of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis. Conclusion: Detention and isolation of non-compliant tuberculosis patients remains in active use. Physicians detaining, or threatening to detain, patients continue to expose themselves to legal liability because of the outdated legal framework underlying those powers. (C) 2008 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 85
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*ACLU, ACLU AR SUES COUNT O
[2]   Short-term incarceration for the management of noncompliance with tuberculosis treatment [J].
Burman, WJ ;
Cohn, DL ;
Rietmeijer, CA ;
Judson, FN ;
Sbarbaro, JA ;
Reves, RR .
CHEST, 1997, 112 (01) :57-62
[3]   Public health law and tuberculosis control in Europe [J].
Coker, R. J. ;
Mounier-Jack, S. ;
Martin, R. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 121 (04) :266-273
[4]  
Coker R.J., 2000, From chaos to coercion: Detention and the control of tuberculosis
[5]   Communicable disease control and contemporary themes in public health law [J].
Coker, Richard .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 120 :23-28
[6]   National survey of detention and TB [J].
Coker, RJ .
THORAX, 2001, 56 (10) :818-818
[7]  
*EUR SURV, 2008, DEM FEAT TRENDS TUB, V13
[8]  
*EUROTB NAT COORD, 2008, SURV TUB EUR REP TUB
[9]   The use of legal action in New York City to ensure treatment of tuberculosis [J].
Gasner, MR ;
Maw, KL ;
Feldman, GE ;
Fujiwara, PI ;
Frieden, TR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (05) :359-366
[10]   The exercise of public health powers in an era of human rights: the particular problems of tuberculosis [J].
Harris, A ;
Martin, R .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 118 (05) :313-322