Port-site metastases following robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies

被引:26
作者
Lonnerfors, Celine
Bossmar, Thomas
Persson, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Gynecological cancer; port-site metastases; robotic surgery; cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; TUMOR IMPLANTATION; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; CLOSURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12245
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and possible predictors associated with port-site metastases following robotic surgery. DesignProspective study. SettingUniversity Hospital. PopulationWomen with gynecological cancer. MethodsThe occurrence of port-site metastases in the first 475 women undergoing robotic surgery for gynecological cancer was reviewed. Main outcome measuresRate of port-site metastases. ResultsA port-site metastasis was detected in nine of 475 women (1.9%). Eight women had either an unexpected locally advanced disease or lymph-node metastases at the time of surgery. All nine women received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Women with stage III endometrial cancer and women with node positive cervical cancer had a significantly higher risk of developing a port-site metastasis, as did women with high-risk histology endometrial cancer. Port-site metastases were four times more likely to occur in a specimen-retrieval port. One (0.2%) isolated port-site metastasis was detected. The median time to occurrence of a port-site metastasis was 6months (range 2-19months). Six of the nine women (67%) have died and their median time of survival from recurrence was 4months (range 2-16months). ConclusionIn women with gynecological cancer, the incidence of port-site metastases following robotic surgery was 1.9%. High-risk histology and/or advanced stage of disease at surgery seem to be contributing factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1361 / 1368
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Subcutaneous tumor implantation after laparoscopic procedures in women with malignant disease [J].
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Rhee, EH ;
Chi, DS ;
Sonoda, Y ;
Gemignani, M ;
Barakat, RR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03) :480-487
[2]  
Agostini A, 2002, SURG ENDOSC, V16, P289, DOI 10.1007/s00464-001-9063-0
[3]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[4]  
Bolles O., 2012, GYNECOL ONCOL REP, V2, P32
[5]   Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum technique on port site tumor implantation in and wound closure a rat model [J].
Burns, JM ;
Matthews, BD ;
Pollinger, HS ;
Mostafa, G ;
Joels, CS ;
Austin, CE ;
Kercher, KW ;
Norton, HJ ;
Heniford, BT .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (03) :441-447
[6]   Port site metastasis and tumor seeding in oncologic laparoscopic urology [J].
Castillo, Octavio A. ;
Vitagliano, Gonzalo .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (03) :372-378
[7]   Port site metastases [J].
Curet, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 187 (06) :705-712
[8]   Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Approaches A Systematic Review [J].
Gaia, Giorgia ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Santoro, Luigi ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Di Silverio, Elena ;
Spinillo, Arsenio .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (06) :1422-1431
[9]   Laparoscopic port site metastases: Incidence, risk factors, and potential preventive measures [J].
Lee, BR ;
Tan, BJ ;
Smith, AD .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) :639-644
[10]  
Lonnerfors C, 2013, Ceska Gynekol, V78, P12