Outbound knowledge transfer in high-tech small firms: The role of process innovation and development cost

被引:5
作者
de Jong, Jeroen P. J. [1 ]
Turro, Andreu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ, Kriekenpitpl 21-22, NL-3584 EC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Business, Bellaterra, Spain
关键词
high-tech small firms; open innovation; outbound knowledge transfer; process innovation; product innovation; PRIVATE-COLLECTIVE INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; PRODUCT; TAXONOMY; USER; COMPLEMENTARITY; COOPERATION; COMPETITION; SPILLOVERS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12488
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Innovation-related knowledge can be voluntarily transferred to other organizations for direct or indirect benefits, but firms can also suffer from involuntary transfer when their knowledge leaks and gets stolen. Despite its relevance to managers, outbound knowledge transfer has been understudied. Previous theoretical perspectives suggest that the primary reason why firms innovate-to conquer markets with product innovation or to improve internal processes with process innovation-matters for how outbound knowledge transfer takes shape. Also, higher stakes represented by innovation development cost can be expected to moderate the relationship between innovation type and outbound transfer. We analyse survey data of 176 high-tech small firms to find that, indeed, process innovations are much more likely shared voluntarily, although product innovations leak away without the firm's consent. Development cost moderates voluntary transfer: Low-cost process innovations are barely shared, reflecting a lack of adopter interest, whereas high-cost process innovations are more likely to leak away to similar levels as product innovations. Overall, high-tech small firms are more inclined to voluntary transfer their process innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 491
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]   CUI BONO? THE SELECTIVE REVEALING OF KNOWLEDGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY [J].
Alexy, Oliver ;
George, Gerard ;
Salter, Ammon J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (02) :270-291
[3]   Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding [J].
Anand, Amitabh ;
Centobelli, Piera ;
Cerchione, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (02) :379-399
[4]  
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[5]   What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms [J].
Arundel, A ;
Kabla, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (02) :127-141
[6]   Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
von Hippel, Eric .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) :1399-1417
[7]   Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model [J].
Boas Viveiros Lopes, Ana Paula Vilas ;
de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 132 :284-298
[8]   Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation [J].
Bonanno, G ;
Haworth, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1998, 16 (04) :495-510
[9]   Maneuvering the bumps in the New Silk Road: Open innovation, technological complexity, dominant design, and the international impact of Chinese innovation [J].
Brem, Alexander ;
Nylund, Petra A. .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2021, 51 (03) :293-308
[10]   Mapping the benefits and costs associated with process innovation: The case of RFID adoption [J].
Bunduchi, Raluca ;
Weisshaar, Clara ;
Smart, Alison U. .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (09) :505-521