Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of OTC use of simvastatin 10 mg for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in Iranian men

被引:14
作者
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Hassani, Abbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharm Practice, Esfahan, Iran
来源
DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES | 2015年 / 23卷
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; myocardial infarction; Markov model; Primary prevention; Simvastatin; Over-the-counter; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS; STATINS;
D O I
10.1186/s40199-015-0129-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Several clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown the advantageous effects of statins in populations with different levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Considering the increasing cardiovascular risk among the Iranian population, the cost-effectiveness of the use of simvastatin 10 mg, as an Over-The-Counter (OTC) drug, for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated in this modeling study, from the payer's perspective. The target population is a hypothetical cohort of 45-year CVD healthy men with an average (15 %) 10-year CVD risk. Methods: A semi-Markov model with a life-long time horizon was developed to evaluate the Cost-Utility-Analysis (CUA) and Cost-Effectiveness-Analysis (CEA) of the use of OTC simvastatin 10 mg compared to no-drug therapy. Two measures of benefits were used in the model; Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs) for the CUA and Life-Years-Gained (LYG) for the CEA. To examine the robustness of the results, one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were applied to the model. Results: For the base-case scenario with a discount rate of 0 % the estimated ICERs were 1113 USD/QALY and 935USD/LYG per patient (using governmental tariffs). No threshold has been determined in Iran for the cost-effectiveness of health-related interventions. However, according to the recommendation of WHO, this intervention can be considered highly cost-effective as its ICER is far less than the reported GDP per capita for Iran by World bank in 2013 ($4763). Conclusions: This modeling study showed that the use of an OTC low dose statin (simvastatin 10 mg) for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in 45-year men with a 10-year CVD risk of 15 % could be considered highly cost-effective in Iran, as it meets the WHO threshold of the annual GDP per capita ($4763).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction or instable angina in germany.: An analysis on the basis of the LIPID trial
    Szucs, TD
    Berger, K
    März, W
    Schäfer, J
    HERZ, 2000, 25 (05) : 487 - 494
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Primary Care: PsicAP Clinical Trial. Description of the Sub-study Design
    Ruiz-Rodriguez, Paloma
    Cano-Vindel, Antonio
    Munoz-Navarro, Roger
    Wood, Cristina M.
    Medrano, Leonardo A.
    Sofia Moretti, Luciana
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness analysis of highly concentrated n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction
    Permpanich, Adawan
    Kulsomboon, Vithaya
    Udol, Kamol
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 9 (01) : 21 - 30
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a nurse-led, transitional care model to improve care coordination for patients with cardiovascular diseases: results from the "Cardiolotse" study
    Coors, Marie
    Schuettig, Wiebke
    Reber, Katrin C.
    Darius, Harald
    Holzgreve, Alfred
    Karmann, Sebastian
    Stuertz, Anica
    Zoeller, Rebecca
    Kropp, Saskia
    Riesner, Petra
    Sundmacher, Leonie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [45] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTENSIVE LIPID LOWERING THERAPY WITH 80 MG OF ATORVASTATIN, VERSUS 10 MG OF ATORVASTATIN, FOR SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN CANADA
    Wagner, Monika
    Goetghebeur, Mireille
    Merikle, Elizabeth
    Pandya, Ankur
    Chu, Paula
    Taylor, Douglas C. A.
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 16 (02): : E331 - E345
  • [46] The Use of Bacterial Lysate for the Prevention of Wheezing Episodes in Preschool Children: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Carlos E.
    Sossa-Briceno, Monica P.
    Soto-Martinez, Manuel E.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2023, 11 (01) : 220 - 227
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies
    Kumar, Sajith
    Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, : 1027 - 1040
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of hypertension and hyperlipidemia collaborative management between pharmacies and primary care in portugal alongside a trial compared with usual care (USFarmacia(R))
    Costa, Suzete
    Guerreiro, Jose
    Teixeira, Ines
    Helling, Dennis K.
    Pereira, Joao
    Mateus, Ceu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus (chemo) radiotherapy for early T classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-utility analysis
    de Almeida, John R.
    Moskowitz, Alan J.
    Miles, Brett A.
    Goldstein, David P.
    Teng, Marita S.
    Sikora, Andrew G.
    Gupta, Vishal
    Posner, Marshall
    Genden, Eric M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (04): : 589 - 600
  • [50] A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Krishnan, Anirudh
    Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
    Levine, Erica
    Foley, Perry
    Askew, Sandy
    Steinberg, Dori
    Bennett, Gary G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05)