Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of OTC use of simvastatin 10 mg for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in Iranian men

被引:14
作者
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Hassani, Abbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharm Practice, Esfahan, Iran
来源
DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES | 2015年 / 23卷
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; myocardial infarction; Markov model; Primary prevention; Simvastatin; Over-the-counter; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS; STATINS;
D O I
10.1186/s40199-015-0129-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Several clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown the advantageous effects of statins in populations with different levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Considering the increasing cardiovascular risk among the Iranian population, the cost-effectiveness of the use of simvastatin 10 mg, as an Over-The-Counter (OTC) drug, for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated in this modeling study, from the payer's perspective. The target population is a hypothetical cohort of 45-year CVD healthy men with an average (15 %) 10-year CVD risk. Methods: A semi-Markov model with a life-long time horizon was developed to evaluate the Cost-Utility-Analysis (CUA) and Cost-Effectiveness-Analysis (CEA) of the use of OTC simvastatin 10 mg compared to no-drug therapy. Two measures of benefits were used in the model; Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs) for the CUA and Life-Years-Gained (LYG) for the CEA. To examine the robustness of the results, one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were applied to the model. Results: For the base-case scenario with a discount rate of 0 % the estimated ICERs were 1113 USD/QALY and 935USD/LYG per patient (using governmental tariffs). No threshold has been determined in Iran for the cost-effectiveness of health-related interventions. However, according to the recommendation of WHO, this intervention can be considered highly cost-effective as its ICER is far less than the reported GDP per capita for Iran by World bank in 2013 ($4763). Conclusions: This modeling study showed that the use of an OTC low dose statin (simvastatin 10 mg) for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in 45-year men with a 10-year CVD risk of 15 % could be considered highly cost-effective in Iran, as it meets the WHO threshold of the annual GDP per capita ($4763).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
    Selmer, R
    Halvorsen, S
    Myhre, KI
    Wisloff, TF
    Kristiansen, IS
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2005, 39 (05) : 276 - 285
  • [32] Medicare's use of cost-effectiveness analysis for prevention (but not for treatment)
    Chambers, James D.
    Cangelosi, Michael J.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [33] Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Diagnosing Stable Coronary Artery Disease - A Cost-Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Amemiya, Shiori
    Takao, Hidemasa
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (07) : 1263 - 1270
  • [34] Commentary: Beyond 10-year risk: A cost-effectiveness analysis of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
    Shah, Aditya
    Sharma, Kamal
    Rawal, Shalin
    Sisodia, Rhea
    Bhatt, Parjanya
    Christian, Cleris
    Konat, Ashwati
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Results From the PRECISE Study
    Zucco, Furio
    Ciampichini, Roberta
    Lavano, Angelo
    Costantini, Amedeo
    De Rose, Marisa
    Poli, Paolo
    Fortini, Gianpaolo
    Demartini, Laura
    De Simone, Enrico
    Menardo, Valentino
    Cisotto, Piero
    Meglio, Mario
    Scalone, Luciana
    Mantovani, Lorenzo G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (04): : 266 - 276
  • [36] Comparative cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction
    Elliott, WJ
    Weir, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1999, 56 (17) : 1726 - 1732
  • [37] Not Only Clinical Efficacy in Psychological Treatments: Clinical Psychology Must Promote Cost-Benefit, Cost-Effectiveness, and Cost-Utility Analysis
    Castelnuovo, Gianluca
    Pietrabissa, Giada
    Cattivelli, Roberto
    Manzoni, Gian Mauro
    Molinari, Enrico
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of Haemate-P versus other von Willebrand disease treatments in Spain
    Megias-Vericat, Juan E.
    Escolar, Gines
    Wilson, Michele R.
    Mendez, Pablo
    Mcdade, Cheryl L.
    Barrientos, Laura Vidal
    Tomic, Radovan
    Panebianco, Marco
    Linden, Stephan
    Yan, Songkai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 28 (01) : 436 - 445
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies
    Kumar, S. Sajith
    Haridoss, Madhumitha
    Venkataraman, Krishnamurthy
    Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction or instable angina in germany.: An analysis on the basis of the LIPID trial
    Szucs, TD
    Berger, K
    März, W
    Schäfer, J
    HERZ, 2000, 25 (05) : 487 - 494