Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of OTC use of simvastatin 10 mg for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in Iranian men

被引:14
|
作者
Amirsadri, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Hassani, Abbas [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharm Practice, Esfahan, Iran
来源
DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES | 2015年 / 23卷
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; myocardial infarction; Markov model; Primary prevention; Simvastatin; Over-the-counter; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS; STATINS;
D O I
10.1186/s40199-015-0129-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Several clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown the advantageous effects of statins in populations with different levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Considering the increasing cardiovascular risk among the Iranian population, the cost-effectiveness of the use of simvastatin 10 mg, as an Over-The-Counter (OTC) drug, for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated in this modeling study, from the payer's perspective. The target population is a hypothetical cohort of 45-year CVD healthy men with an average (15 %) 10-year CVD risk. Methods: A semi-Markov model with a life-long time horizon was developed to evaluate the Cost-Utility-Analysis (CUA) and Cost-Effectiveness-Analysis (CEA) of the use of OTC simvastatin 10 mg compared to no-drug therapy. Two measures of benefits were used in the model; Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs) for the CUA and Life-Years-Gained (LYG) for the CEA. To examine the robustness of the results, one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were applied to the model. Results: For the base-case scenario with a discount rate of 0 % the estimated ICERs were 1113 USD/QALY and 935USD/LYG per patient (using governmental tariffs). No threshold has been determined in Iran for the cost-effectiveness of health-related interventions. However, according to the recommendation of WHO, this intervention can be considered highly cost-effective as its ICER is far less than the reported GDP per capita for Iran by World bank in 2013 ($4763). Conclusions: This modeling study showed that the use of an OTC low dose statin (simvastatin 10 mg) for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in 45-year men with a 10-year CVD risk of 15 % could be considered highly cost-effective in Iran, as it meets the WHO threshold of the annual GDP per capita ($4763).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The cost-effectiveness of screening and treatment for hepatitis C in prisons in England and Wales: a cost-utility analysis
    Sutton, A. J.
    Edmunds, W. J.
    Sweeting, M. J.
    Gill, O. N.
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2008, 15 (11) : 797 - 808
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of Ezetimibe plus statin lipid-lowering therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies
    Sasidharan, Akhil
    Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
    Kumar, S. Sajith
    Jagadeesh, Kayala Venkata
    Natarajan, Meenakumari
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [23] Economic evaluation of restrictive vs. liberal transfusion strategy following acute myocardial infarction (REALITY): trial-based cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Ducrocq, Gregory
    Mimouni, Maroua
    Frenkiel, Jerome
    Avendano-Sola, Cristina
    Gonzalez-Juanatey, Jose R.
    Ferrari, Emile
    Lemesle, Gilles
    Puymirat, Etienne
    Berard, Laurence
    Cachanado, Marine
    Arnaiz, Joan Albert
    Martinez-Selles, Manuel
    Silvain, Johanne
    Ariza-Sole, Albert
    Calvo, Gonzalo
    Danchin, Nicolas
    Paco, Sandra
    Drouet, Elodie
    Abergel, Helene
    Rousseau, Alexandra
    Simon, Tabassome
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2023, 9 (02) : 194 - 202
  • [24] Cost–benefit analysis of the polypill in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke
    Nicholas J. Wald
    Johannes Michiel Luteijn
    Joan K. Morris
    David Taylor
    Peter Oppenheimer
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2016, 31 : 415 - 426
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of a psychoeducational group intervention for people with depression and physical comorbidity in primary care
    Raya-Tena, Antonia
    Fernandez-San-Martin, Maria Isabel
    Martin-Royo, Jaume
    Casajuana-Closas, Marc
    Jimenez-Herrera, Maria Francisca
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2024, 34 (02): : 108 - 119
  • [26] Cost-Effectiveness of Alirocumab for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events after Myocardial Infarction in the Chinese Setting
    Liang, Zhe
    Chen, Qi
    Wei, Ruiqi
    Ma, Chenyao
    Zhang, Xuehui
    Chen, Xue
    Fang, Fang
    Zhao, Quanming
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [27] Primary PTCA versus thrombolysis with tPA in acute myocardial infarction:: a formal cost-effectiveness analysis
    Müllner, M
    Paulis, M
    Nikfardjam, M
    Domanovits, H
    Huber, K
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 111 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of a web-based computer-tailored intervention for prevention of binge drinking among Spanish adolescents
    Vargas-Martinez, Ana Magdalena
    Lima-Serrano, Marta
    Trapero-Bertran, Marta
    ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 47 (02): : 319 - 335
  • [29] The Box-eHealth in the Outpatient Clinic Follow-up of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cost-Utility Analysis
    Treskes, Roderick Willem
    Van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    van Winden, Louise
    van Keulen, Nicole
    van der Velde, Enno Tjeerd
    Beeres, Saskia
    Atsma, Douwe
    Schalij, Martin Jan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (04)
  • [30] Effect of Including Cancer Mortality on the Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Men
    Michael Pignone
    Stephanie Earnshaw
    Cheryl McDade
    Mark J. Pletcher
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2013, 28 : 1483 - 1491