Evaluating the risk performance of online peer-to-peer lending platforms in China

被引:4
作者
Wu, Chong [1 ]
Zhang, Dong [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION | 2018年 / 12卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
peer-to-peer (P2P) lending; P2P lending platforms; risk index system entropy-revised G1 combination method; ranking; risk evaluation scores; validation; ENTROPY; INDICATORS; SPEARMANS;
D O I
10.21314/JRMV.2018.187
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, which has received considerable research attention in recent years, has emerged as a viable platform to provide an alternative way of financing without the help of traditional intermediaries such as banks. However, P2P lending platforms have experienced risks in China, and previous research mainly focuses on using subjective methods for constructing and assessing the risk index system of P2P platforms. We propose a novel approach to establishing a risk index system based on previous research and real-world data, selected using correlation analysis and principal component analysis. Moreover, the entropy-revised G1 combination method has been used in this paper to assess the risk performance of P2P lending platforms, with both expert knowledge and real-world data taken into account. In this paper, we use information contribution to show the constructed risk index system is valid. In addition, we rank the ninety-two P2P lending platforms based on their calculated risk evaluation scores, which are further tested with the ranking offered by China's rating agency using Spearman's coefficient. Testing results show the proposed risk assessment for P2P platforms in China is rational and efficient, giving us unique insight into how to evaluate the risk performance of P2P platforms, and thus can be used by regulators to better supervise these platforms in China.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 87
页数:25
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies
    Geist, Monica R.
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2010, 33 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [12] Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending
    Guo, Yanhong
    Zhou, Wenjun
    Luo, Chunyu
    Liu, Chuanren
    Xiong, Hui
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 249 (02) : 417 - 426
  • [13] Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods
    Han, Baolong
    Liu, Hongxiao
    Wang, Rusong
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 318 : 217 - 225
  • [14] INDEX OF FACTORIAL SIMPLICITY
    KAISER, HF
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1974, 39 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [15] A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies
    Kokangul, Ali
    Polat, Ulviye
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 91 : 24 - 32
  • [16] Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences
    Landeta, Jon
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2006, 73 (05) : 467 - 482
  • [17] A methodology based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the quantitative assessment of emergency preparedness and response in road tunnels
    Manca, Davide
    Brambilla, Sara
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (05) : 657 - 664
  • [18] Green building supplier selection based on advanced entropy-revised G1 combination weighting and TOPSIS
    Mao, Yi Hua
    Wang, Ping
    Sun, Fei
    Zhou, Wei Hua
    [J]. ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 357-360 : 2748 - +
  • [19] The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study
    Mollick, Ethan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [20] Omangi H. G., 2005, BIOPHYS J, V88, P3699