In-silico screening of database for finding potential sweet molecules: A combined data and structure based modeling approach

被引:17
作者
Goel, Anukrati [1 ]
Gajula, Kishore [1 ]
Gupta, Rakesh [1 ]
Rai, Beena [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Consultancy Serv, Tata Res Dev & Design Ctr, Phys Sci Res Area, 54 B,Hadapsar Ind Estate, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Structure activity relationship models; Classification model; Similarity analysis; Molecular docking; RECEPTOR; PREDICTION; BITTER; RESPONSES; ANALOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128538
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
In this study, we present a framework comprises of several independent modules which are built upon data based (structure activity relationship and classification model) and structure (molecular docking) based for identifying possible sweeteners from a vast database of natural molecules. A large database, Universal Natural Products Database (UNPD) consisting of 213,210 compounds was screened using the developed framework. At first, 10,184 molecules structurally similar to the known sweeteners were identified in the database. Further, 1924 molecules from these screened molecules were classified as sweet molecules. The shortlisted 1354 molecules were subjected to ADMET analysis. Finally, 60 molecules were arrived at with no toxicity and acceptable oral bioavailability as potential sweetener candidates. Further, molecular docking of these molecules on sweet taste receptor performed to obtain their binding energy, binding sites and correlation with sweetness index. The developed framework offers a convenient route for fast screening of molecules prior to synthesis and testing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Students' Decisions to Use an eLearning System: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis [J].
Abbad, M. M. ;
Morris, D. ;
Al-Ayyoub, A. ;
Abbad, J. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2009, 4 (04) :4-13
[2]   Identifying the interactions between natural, non-caloric sweeteners and the human sweet receptor by molecular docking [J].
Acevedo, Waldo ;
Ramirez-Sarmiento, Cesar A. ;
Agosin, Eduardo .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2018, 264 :164-171
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Diabetes
[4]   Interactions between the human sweet-sensing T1R2-T1R3 receptor and sweeteners detected by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy [J].
Assadi-Porter, Fariba M. ;
Tonelli, Marco ;
Maillet, Emeline L. ;
Markley, John L. ;
max, Marianna .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES, 2010, 1798 (02) :82-86
[5]   Sweetness prediction of natural compounds [J].
Cheron, Jean-Baptiste ;
Casciuc, Iuri ;
Golebiowski, Jerome ;
Antonczak, Serge ;
Fiorucci, Sebastien .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2017, 221 :1421-1425
[6]   Passion fruit juice with different sweeteners: sensory profile by descriptive analysis and acceptance [J].
de Oliveira Rocha, Izabela Furtado ;
Andre Bolini, Helena Maria .
FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2015, 3 (02) :129-139
[7]   Some G protein heterotrimers physically dissociate in living cells [J].
Digby, Gregory J. ;
Lober, Robert M. ;
Sethi, Pooja R. ;
Lambert, Nevin A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (47) :17789-17794
[8]   Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of sulfamates RNHSO3Na:: Distinction between sweet, sweet-bitter, and bitter molecules [J].
Drew, MGB ;
Wilden, GRH ;
Spillane, WJ ;
Walsh, RM ;
Ryder, CA ;
Simmie, JM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (08) :3016-3026
[9]   THE HEALTH RISKS OF SACCHARIN REVISITED [J].
ELLWEIN, LB ;
COHEN, SM .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 20 (05) :311-326
[10]  
European Commission, 2011, OFF J EUR UNION, V295