Effects of vegetation structure on biomass accumulation in a Balanced Optimality Structure Vegetation Model (BOSVM v1.0)

被引:8
|
作者
Yin, Z. [1 ]
Dekker, S. C. [2 ]
van den Hurk, B. J. J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Dijkstra, H. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Inst Marine & Atmospher Res Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
关键词
FOREST TRANSPIRATION; SOIL-MOISTURE; WATER; FEEDBACKS; CLIMATE; DETERMINANTS; PRODUCTIVITY; VARIABILITY; PATTERNS; SAVANNA;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-7-821-2014
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A myriad of interactions exist between vegetation and local climate for arid and semi-arid regions. Vegetation function, structure and individual behavior have large impacts on carbon-water-energy balances, which consequently influence local climate variability that, in turn, feeds back to the vegetation. In this study, a conceptual vegetation structure scheme is formulated and tested in the new Balanced Optimality Structure Vegetation Model (BOSVM) to explore the importance of vegetation structure and vegetation adaptation to water stress on equilibrium biomass states. Surface energy, water and carbon fluxes are simulated for a range of vegetation structures across a precipitation gradient in West Africa and optimal vegetation structures that maximize biomass for each precipitation regime are determined. Two different strategies of vegetation adaptation to water stress are included. Under dry conditions vegetation tries to maximize the water use efficiency and leaf area index as it tries to maximize carbon gain. However, a negative feedback mechanism in the vegetation-soil water system is found as the vegetation also tries to minimize its cover to optimize the surrounding bare ground area from which water can be extracted, thereby forming patches of vertical vegetation. Under larger precipitation, a positive feedback mechanism is found in which vegetation tries to maximize its cover as it then can reduce water loss from bare soil while having maximum carbon gain due to a large leaf area index. The competition between vegetation and bare soil determines a transition between a "survival" state to a "growing" state.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 845
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A dynamic local-scale vegetation model for lycopsids (LYCOm v1.0)
    Halder, Suman
    Arens, Susanne K. M.
    Jensen, Kai
    Dahl, Tais W.
    Porada, Philipp
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (05) : 2325 - 2343
  • [2] PALADYN v1.0, a comprehensive land surface-vegetation-carbon cycle model of intermediate complexity
    Willeit, Matteo
    Ganopolski, Andrey
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (10) : 3817 - 3857
  • [3] An urban ecohydrological model to quantify the effect of vegetation on urban climate and hydrology (UT&C v1.0)
    Meili, Naika
    Manoli, Gabriele
    Burlando, Paolo
    Bou-Zeid, Elie
    Chow, Winston T. L.
    Coutts, Andrew M.
    Daly, Edoardo
    Nice, Kerry A.
    Roth, Matthias
    Tapper, Nigel J.
    Velasco, Erik
    Vivoni, Enrique R.
    Fatichi, Simone
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 13 (01) : 335 - 362
  • [4] Autobench V1.0: Benchmarking Automation for Electronic Structure Calculations
    Cormanich, Rodrigo A.
    da Silva, Gabriel D.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2024, 64 (08) : 3322 - 3331
  • [5] A comprehensive land-surface vegetation model for multi-stream data assimilation, D&B v1.0
    Knorr, Wolfgang
    Williams, Matthew
    Thum, Tea
    Kaminski, Thomas
    Vossbeck, Michael
    Scholze, Marko
    Quaife, Tristan
    Smallman, T. Luke
    Steele-Dunne, Susan C.
    Vreugdenhil, Mariette
    Green, Tim
    Zaehle, Soenke
    Aurela, Mika
    Bouvet, Alexandre
    Bueechi, Emanuel
    Dorigo, Wouter
    El-Madany, Tarek S.
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Honkanen, Marika
    Kerr, Yann H.
    Kontu, Anna
    Lemmetyinen, Juha
    Lindqvist, Hannakaisa
    Mialon, Arnaud
    Miinalainen, Tuuli
    Pique, Gaetan
    Ojasalo, Amanda
    Quegan, Shaun
    Rayner, Peter J.
    Reyes-Munoz, Pablo
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Nemesio
    Schwank, Mike
    Verrelst, Jochem
    Zhu, Songyan
    Schuettemeyer, Dirk
    Drusch, Matthias
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 18 (07) : 2137 - 2159
  • [6] BIOMASS, STRUCTURE, AND TROPHIC ENVIRONMENT OF PEATLAND VEGETATION IN MINNESOTA
    SWANSON, DK
    GRIGAL, DF
    WETLANDS, 1991, 11 (02) : 279 - 302
  • [7] FUSION OF LIDAR AND RADAR FOR VEGETATION STRUCTURE AND BIOMASS RETRIEVAL
    Ni-Meister, Wenge
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 5346 - 5349
  • [8] A model for global biomass burning in preindustrial time: LPJ-LMfire (v1.0)
    Pfeiffer, M.
    Spessa, A.
    Kaplan, J. O.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (03) : 643 - 685
  • [9] DeepPhenoMem V1.0: deep learning modelling of canopy greenness dynamics accounting for multi-variate meteorological memory effects on vegetation phenology
    Liu, Guohua
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Reimers, Christian
    Kraft, Basil
    Reichstein, Markus
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Wingate, Lisa
    Delpierre, Nicolas
    Yang, Hui
    Winkler, Alexander J.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 17 (17) : 6683 - 6701
  • [10] Quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on snow accumulation and ablation in mixed-conifer forests
    Broxton, P. D.
    Harpold, A. A.
    Biederman, J. A.
    Troch, P. A.
    Molotch, N. P.
    Brooks, P. D.
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) : 1073 - 1094