Clinical Applications of Wavefront Refraction

被引:23
作者
Bruce, Adrian S. [1 ,2 ]
Catania, Louis J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Coll Optometry, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Nicolitz Eye Consultants, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
wavefront refraction; cataract; keratoconus; higher-order aberrations of the eye; normal populations; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; JUST-NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCES; MESOPIC PUPIL SIZE; DRY EYE; MONOCHROMATIC ABERRATIONS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; SPHERICAL-ABERRATION; VISUAL-ACUITY; OCULAR ABERRATIONS; CATARACT-SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000377
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine normative reference ranges for higher-order wavefront error (HO-WFE), compare these values with those in common ocular pathologies, and evaluate treatments. Methods A review of 17 major studies on HO-WFE was made, involving data for a total of 31,605 subjects. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for HO-WFE was calculated from the most comprehensive of these studies using normal healthy patients aged 20 to 80 years. There were no studies identified using the natural pupil size for subjects, and for this reason, the HO-WFE was tabulated for pupil diameters of 3 to 7 mm. Effects of keratoconus, pterygium, cataract, and dry eye on HO-WFE were reviewed and treatment efficacy was considered. Results The calculated upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE in a healthy normal 35-year-old patient with a mesopic pupil diameter of 6 mm would be 0.471 m (471 nm) root-mean-square or less. Although the normal HO-WFE increases with age for a given pupil size, it is not yet completely clear how the concurrent influence of age-related pupillary miosis affects these findings. Abnormal ocular conditions such as keratoconus can induce a large HO-WFE, often in excess of 3.0 m, particularly attributed to coma. For pterygium or cortical cataract, a combination of coma and trefoil was more commonly induced. Nuclear cataract can induce a negative spherical HO-WFE, usually in excess of 1.0 m. Conclusions The upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE root-mean-square is about 0.5 m with normal physiological pupil sizes. With ocular pathologies, HO-WFE can be in excess of 1.0 m, although many devices and therapeutic and surgical treatments are reported to be highly effective at minimizing HO-WFE. More accurate normative reference ranges for HO-WFE will require future studies using the subjects' natural pupil size.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1286
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Refractive error sensing from wavefront slopes
    Navarro, Rafael
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2010, 10 (13): : 1 - 15
  • [32] Customized schematic eye model for refraction correction design based on ocular wavefront and corneal topography measurements
    Curatu, EO
    Pettit, GH
    Campin, JA
    OPHTHALMIC TECHNOLOGIES XII, 2002, 4611 : 165 - 175
  • [33] Outcome comparison between wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hamam, Khaled M.
    Gbreel, Mohamed I.
    Elsheikh, Randa
    Benmelouka, Amira Y.
    Ouerdane, Yassamine
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Hamdallah, Aboalmagd
    Elsnhory, Ahmed B.
    Nourelden, Anas Z.
    Masoud, Ahmed T.
    Ali, Asmaa A.
    Ragab, Khaled M.
    Ibrahim, Ahmed M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (12) : 2691 - 2698
  • [34] The theoretical limit to the accuracy of clinical refraction measurement
    A. I. Milanich
    Measurement Techniques, 2008, 51 : 317 - 319
  • [35] The theoretical limit to the accuracy of clinical refraction measurement
    Milanich, A. I.
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2008, 51 (03) : 317 - 319
  • [36] A comparison of wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided ablations
    Myrowitz, Elliott H.
    Chuck, Roy S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) : 247 - 250
  • [37] Comparative study of Acrysof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lenses +4.00 D and +3.00 D: visual performance and wavefront error
    Toto, Lisa
    Carpineto, Paolo
    Falconio, Gennaro
    Agnifili, Luca
    Di Nicola, Marta
    Mastropasqua, Alessandra
    Mastropasqua, Leonardo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2013, 96 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [38] Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different aspheric intraocular lenses
    Lee, Kyung-Min
    Park, Shin-Hae
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2011, 89 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [39] Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors
    Ravikumar, Ayeswarya
    Marsack, Jason D.
    Bedell, Harold E.
    Shi, Yue
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (13):
  • [40] Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration
    Pepose, Jay S.
    Qazi, Mujtaba A.
    Edwards, Keith H.
    Sanderson, Jeff P.
    Sarver, Edwin J.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 247 (07) : 965 - 973