Gentrification in Amsterdam: Assessing the Importance of Context

被引:18
作者
Hochstenbach, Cody [1 ]
Musterd, Sako [1 ]
Teernstra, Annalies [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Urban Studies, Urban Geog, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
marginal gentrification; housing market; incumbent upgrading; displacement; institutional context; Amsterdam; NEW-BUILD GENTRIFICATION; NEW-YORK-CITY; RESIDENTIAL-MOBILITY; NEIGHBORHOODS; LONDON; DISPLACEMENT; HISTORIES; ROTTERDAM; DIVERSITY; GEOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/psp.1854
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates the income levels and income developments of in-migrating, out-migrating, and sitting households in gentrifying neighbourhoods in Amsterdam over a 10-year period (1999-2008). First, to analyse these data, this paper discusses the impact of institutional and housing market contexts on the residential-mobility patterns of households and subsequently discusses the outcomes of gentrification processes. The general Continental-European context and the specific context of Amsterdam are highlighted in particular. We argue that in highly regulated markets, marginal gentrification can form an important process of neighbourhood upgrading. This contrasts the gentrification stage model. Second, using a unique, individual-level longitudinal dataset, we show that gentrifying neighbourhoods in Amsterdam arguably form cases of marginal gentrification. Recent in-migrants possess incomes that are structurally lower than the incomes of sitting residents. However, in-migrants experience significant incumbent upgrading after moving in, more so than the sitting population. The Amsterdam housing market, dominated by social-rental housing, is key to explaining these mobility patterns. Yet, a gradual liberalisation of the social-rental stock could arguably contribute to more mature forms of gentrification. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 770
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Neighbourhood Change, Mobility and Incumbent Processes: Exploring Income Developments of In-migrants, Out-migrants and Non-migrants of Neighbourhoods [J].
Teernstra, Annalies .
URBAN STUDIES, 2014, 51 (05) :978-999
[42]  
Ter Horst P., 1997, FRAGMENTED BRUSSELS
[44]  
Uitermark J, 2014, ENV PLANNIN IN PRESS, V46
[45]   Gentrification as a governmental strategy: social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam [J].
Uitermark, Justus ;
Duyvendak, Jan Willem ;
Kleinhans, Reinout .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2007, 39 (01) :125-141
[46]  
Uitermark Justus., 2009, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, V13, P347, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982813, DOI 10.1080/13604810902982813]
[47]   Revisiting the diversity of gentrification: Neighbourhood renewal processes in brussels and Montreal [J].
Van Criekingen, M ;
Decroly, JM .
URBAN STUDIES, 2003, 40 (12) :2451-2468
[48]   'Gentrifying the Re-urbanisation Debate', Not Vice Versa: The Uneven Socio-spatial Implications of Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Brussels [J].
Van Criekingen, Mathieu .
POPULATION SPACE AND PLACE, 2010, 16 (05) :381-394
[49]   Neoliberalization, Housing Institutions and Variegated Gentrification: How the 'Third Wave' Broke in Amsterdam [J].
van Gent, W. P. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (02) :503-522
[50]   THE NEW DIVIDED CITY: CHANGING PATTERNS IN EUROPEAN CITIES [J].
Van Kempen, Ronald ;
Murie, Alan .
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2009, 100 (04) :377-398