Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screws for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Inlay Graft Fixation A Comparative Study

被引:16
|
作者
Gupta, Aman [2 ]
Lattermann, Christian [3 ]
Busam, Matthew [4 ]
Riff, Andrew [5 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Wang, Vincent M.
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Div Sports Med, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Cincinnati Sports Med Res & Educ Fdn, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Georgetown Med Sch, Washington, DC USA
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; inlay; reconstruction; tendon graft; TENDON-BONE GRAFT; TIBIAL INLAY; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUES; ANKLE FRACTURES; SINGLE-BUNDLE; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546508328106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. Results: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load S stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness S stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. Conclusion: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study
    Fayed, Aly M.
    Kanto, Ryo
    Price, Taylor M.
    DiNenna, Michael
    Linde, Monica A.
    Smolinski, Patrick
    van Eck, Carola
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [42] Comparative study of fixation mode in total knee arthroplasty with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament
    Gicquel, P
    Kempf, JF
    Gastaud, F
    Schlemmer, B
    Bonnomet, F
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2000, 86 (03): : 240 - 249
  • [43] Screw oversizing for anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation in primary and enlarged tibial tunnels: A biomechanical study in a porcine model
    Eichinger, Martin
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Attal, Rene
    Moroder, Armin
    Heinrichs, Christian Heinz
    Smekal, Vinzenz
    Mayr, Raul
    KNEE, 2018, 25 (05) : 774 - 781
  • [44] Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Interference Screw Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Shen, Chao
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    Dai, Li-Yang
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (05) : 705 - 713
  • [45] In vivo evaluation of femoral and tibial graft tunnel placement following all-inside arthroscopic tibial inlay reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament
    Osti, Michael
    Krawinkel, Alessa
    Benedetto, Karl Peter
    KNEE, 2014, 21 (06) : 1198 - 1202
  • [46] Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation first in anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best restores knee kinematics
    Zheng, Libin
    Sabzevari, Soheil
    Marshall, Brandon
    Zhu, Junjun
    Linde, Monica A.
    Smolinski, Patrick
    Fu, Freddie H.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (04) : 1237 - 1244
  • [47] Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Versus Achilles Tendon Bone Block Allograft
    Forsythe, Brian
    Haro, Marc S.
    Bogunovic, Ljiljana
    Collins, Michael J.
    Arns, Thomas A.
    Trella, Katie J.
    Shewman, Elizabeth F.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (08)
  • [48] Comparative evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty: An in vivo study
    Ma, Yuan
    Chen, Wei-Jia
    Nagamine, Ryuji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (01)
  • [49] Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: A cadaveric study
    Zehms, Chad T.
    Whiddon, David R.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Quinby, J. Scott
    Montgomery, Scott L.
    Campbell, R. Brick
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (04) : 472 - 480
  • [50] Quadruple Semitendinosus Graft Construct With Double Cortical Suspensory Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study
    Madail, Carla Alexandra
    Vaz, Maria de Fatima
    Amaral, Pedro Miguel
    Consciencia, Jose Guimaraes
    Silva, Alcindo Lucas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8