Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screws for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Inlay Graft Fixation A Comparative Study

被引:16
|
作者
Gupta, Aman [2 ]
Lattermann, Christian [3 ]
Busam, Matthew [4 ]
Riff, Andrew [5 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Wang, Vincent M.
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Div Sports Med, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Cincinnati Sports Med Res & Educ Fdn, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Georgetown Med Sch, Washington, DC USA
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; inlay; reconstruction; tendon graft; TENDON-BONE GRAFT; TIBIAL INLAY; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUES; ANKLE FRACTURES; SINGLE-BUNDLE; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546508328106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. Results: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load S stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness S stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. Conclusion: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Buttress Plating Versus Anterior-to-Posterior Lag Screws for Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus: A Biomechanical Study
    Bennett, Chase
    Behn, Anthony
    Daoud, Adam
    Nork, Sean
    Sangeorzan, Bruce
    Dikos, Gregory
    Bishop, Julius
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2016, 30 (12) : 664 - 669
  • [32] Stiffer Fixation of the Tibial Double-Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Complex Versus the Single Tunnel: A Biomechanical Study
    Meuffels, Duncan E.
    Docter, Pieter T.
    van Dongen, Roland A.
    Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
    Verhaar, Jan A. N.
    Reijman, Max
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (09) : S35 - S40
  • [33] Evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in single case posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing the graft peak stress may increase posterior tibial translation
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Xiong, Yan
    Li, Qi
    Chen, Gang
    Zhang, Zhong
    Tang, Xin
    Li, Jian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [34] Comparison of fixed versus adjustable-loop device for femoral graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
    Bagherifard, Abolfazl
    Jabalameli, Mahmoud
    Rahimi, Fouad
    Ghaderi, Mohamad Taher
    Kassir, Hassan Assad
    Naderi, Nima
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2022, 33 (02): : 155 - 159
  • [35] Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Metallic Interference Screws for Graft Fixation During ACL Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu, Baoyun
    Yin, Yuling
    Zhu, Yanling
    Yin, Yu
    Fu, Weili
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [36] Primary stability of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures: A biomechanical in vitro study
    Kitamura, N
    Yasuda, K
    Tohyama, H
    Yamanaka, M
    Tanabe, Y
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (08) : 970 - 978
  • [37] Biomechanical evaluation of double bundle augmentation of posterior cruciate ligament using finite element analysis
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Kim, Yoon Hyuk
    Ha, Jeong Han
    Kim, Kyungsoo
    Park, Won Man
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 25 (10) : 1042 - 1046
  • [38] Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees
    Hung, Chu-Chih
    Chen, Wen-Chuan
    Yang, Chan-Tsung
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    Chen, Chih-Hwa
    Lai, Yu-Shu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2014, 2 (02) : 82 - 90
  • [39] Biomechanical analysis of femoral tunnel pull-out angles for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable and metal interference screws
    Zhang, Alan L.
    Lewicky, Yuri M.
    Oka, Richard
    Mahar, Andrew
    Pedowitz, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04) : 637 - 642
  • [40] The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro
    Halewood, Camilla
    Hirschmann, Michael T.
    Newman, Simon
    Hleihil, Jaffar
    Chaimski, Gershon
    Amis, Andrew A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (04) : 559 - 567