Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screws for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Inlay Graft Fixation A Comparative Study

被引:16
|
作者
Gupta, Aman [2 ]
Lattermann, Christian [3 ]
Busam, Matthew [4 ]
Riff, Andrew [5 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Wang, Vincent M.
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Div Sports Med, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Cincinnati Sports Med Res & Educ Fdn, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Georgetown Med Sch, Washington, DC USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; inlay; reconstruction; tendon graft; TENDON-BONE GRAFT; TIBIAL INLAY; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUES; ANKLE FRACTURES; SINGLE-BUNDLE; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546508328106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. Results: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load S stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness S stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. Conclusion: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Debieux, Pedro
    Franciozi, Carlos E. S.
    Lenza, Mario
    Tamaoki, Marcel Jun
    Magnussen, Robert A.
    Faloppa, Flavio
    Belloti, Joao Carlos
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (07):
  • [2] Biomechanical evaluation of different anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft
    Monaco, E.
    Labianca, L.
    Speranza, A.
    Agro, A. M.
    Camillieri, G.
    D'Arrigo, C.
    Ferretti, A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [3] Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Campbell, R. Brick
    Torrie, Alec
    Heckert, Aaron
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (10): : 1731 - 1738
  • [4] Transtibial Versus Tibial Inlay Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Long-term Follow-up Study
    Song, Eun-Kyoo
    Park, Hyeong-Won
    Ahn, Yeong-Seub
    Seon, Jong-Keun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (12): : 2964 - 2971
  • [5] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Kim, Dong-Hee
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Ahn, Hyeong-Sik
    Lee, Tae-Ho
    Hwang, Sun-Chul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (11): : 2789 - 2797
  • [6] Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dynamic posterior cruciate ligament brace
    Heinrichs, Christian H.
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Mayr, Raul
    Keiler, Alexander
    Schoettle, Philip B.
    Attal, Rene
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 33 : 20 - 25
  • [7] Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures
    Domnick, Christoph
    Koesters, Clemens
    Franke, Friederike
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Petersen, Wolf
    Fink, Christian
    Herbort, Mirco
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1065 - 1071
  • [8] Metallic or bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction?
    Papalia, Rocco
    Vasta, Sebastiano
    D'Adamio, Stefano
    Giacalone, Antonino
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 109 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [9] THE BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENT POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
    Guo, Na
    Qi, Yansong
    Yang, Biao
    Han, Zhonghao
    Hu, Lei
    Xu, Yongsheng
    Wang, Tianmiao
    Yu, Jiakuo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 18 (08)
  • [10] The biomechanical characteristics of arthroscopic tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro comparison of tibial graft tunnel placement
    Benedetto, Karl Peter
    Hoffelner, Thomas
    Osti, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (11) : 2363 - 2368