Can Water Rights Trading Scheme Promote Regional Water Conservation in China? Evidence from a Time-Varying DID Analysis

被引:21
作者
Fang, Lin [1 ]
Wu, Fengping [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaiyin Inst Technol, Fac Math & Phys, Huaian 223001, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water rights trading; regional water consumption; time-varying DID method; influence mechanism; heterogeneity analysis;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17186679
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 1998 to 2017, we adopt a time-varying difference-in-differences (time-varying DID) model to estimate the impact of water rights trading scheme on regional water consumption. The results show that water rights trading can significantly promote water conservation in the pilot regions by 3.1% compared to that in the non-pilot regions, and a series of robustness tests show consistent results. Policy effects are mainly driven by improving water-use efficiency and adjusting water structure; that is, by transferring water resources from the agricultural sector to the other sectors, agricultural water efficiency is improved and water conflict among sectors is alleviated; thus, water saving is achieved. In addition, by constructing two indexes of regional water pressure and tradable water resources, our heterogeneity analysis shows that water rights trading performs better in areas with high water pressure and large tradable water resources. Under the high pressure of large water use and low water endowment, water rights trading will evidently reduce water consumption more so than in the low-pressure regions, and with water rights trading, it is hard to achieve a policy effect in regions without sufficient tradable water resources. This paper provides important policy implications for China for further promoting the water rights trading scheme in the field of resource conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [2] Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis
    Bel, Germa
    Joseph, Stephan
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 : 531 - 539
  • [3] Impact of the economic recession on the European power sector's CO2 emissions
    Declercq, Bruno
    Delarue, Erik
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) : 1677 - 1686
  • [4] An agro-economic approach to framing perennial farm-scale water resources demand management for water rights markets
    Delorit, Justin D.
    Parker, Dominic P.
    Block, Paul J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 218 : 68 - 81
  • [5] Does the trading of water rights encourage technology improvement and agricultural water conservation?
    Fang, Lin
    Zhang, Lin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 233
  • [6] Fu S., 2016, SW FINANC, V11, P72
  • [7] Guo F., 2018, CHINA EC Q, V17, P221, DOI [10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2017.04.09, DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2017.04.09]
  • [8] [韩洪云 HAN Hong-yun], 2010, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population·Resources and Environment], V20, P100
  • [9] Han M., 2012, ECOL ECON, V4, P33
  • [10] Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China
    Hu, Yucai
    Ren, Shenggang
    Wang, Yangjie
    Chen, Xiaohong
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85