Linking genomics and fish conservation decision making: a review

被引:24
作者
Bernos, Thais A. [1 ,2 ]
Jeffries, Ken M. [3 ]
Mandrak, Nicholas E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Biol Sci, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Biol Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Adaptive capacity; Climate change; Invasive species; Management units; Monitoring; Conservation decision framework; POPULATION GENOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; GENE FLOW; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; COPRODUCTION; CLIMATE; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; INTROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11160-020-09618-8
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Despite the promising applications of genome-wide information to conservation, the field of conservation genomics remains hindered by a research-practice gap. Identifying the benefits from genomics in relation to fish conservation planning and decision-making could contribute to bridging this gap. The goals of our study were twofold. First, we reviewed the fish conservation genomic literature to determine how genomic information has been used to inform conservation decision making; and second, we examined how genomic information can be linked to an existing conservation decision framework. Our review showed that, as fish conservation genomics studies accumulate over time, collaborations between researchers and conservation practitioners are becoming increasingly frequent. While the field is dominated by studies of economically important families (e.g. salmonids, acipenserids) in first-world countries (North America, Europe), it has a broad taxonomic coverage where species of both local and global conservation concern are well represented. We also show that genomic information can readily be harnessed to guide decisions within existing conservation decision frameworks, from the conceptualization (identification of conservation targets and threats) to the implementation and the monitoring of conservation actions. In addition, our review identifies some limitations related to genomic inferences for conservation and proposes solutions to address these uncertainties and improve communication between conservation genomic scientists and practitioners. For genomic researchers, we outline how conservation decisions are made; for practitioners, we illustrate how genomic information can inform decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 604
页数:18
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [21] Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making
    Cook, Carly N.
    Inayatullah, Sohail
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Sutherland, William J.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (09) : 531 - 541
  • [22] Knowledge co-production: A pathway to effective fisheries management, conservation, and governance
    Cooke, Steven J.
    Nguyen, Vivian M.
    Chapman, Jacqueline M.
    Reid, Andrea J.
    Landsman, Sean J.
    Young, Nathan
    Hinch, Scott G.
    Schott, Stephan
    Mandrak, Nicholas E.
    Semeniuk, Christina A. D.
    [J]. FISHERIES, 2021, 46 (02) : 89 - 97
  • [23] Who's your mama? Riverine hybridisation of threatened freshwater Trout Cod and Murray Cod
    Couch, Alan J.
    Unmack, Peter J.
    Dyer, Fiona J.
    Lintermans, Mark
    [J]. PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [24] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities
    Deiner, Kristy
    Bik, Holly M.
    Machler, Elvira
    Seymour, Mathew
    Lacoursiere-Roussel, Anais
    Altermatt, Florian
    Creer, Simon
    Bista, Iliana
    Lodge, David M.
    de Vere, Natasha
    Pfrender, Michael E.
    Bernatchez, Louis
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2017, 26 (21) : 5872 - 5895
  • [25] Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Chapman, Sarah
    Althor, Glenn
    Kearney, Stephen
    Besancon, Charles
    Butt, Nathalie
    Maina, Joseph M.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    von Bieberstein, Katharina Rogalla
    Venter, Oscar
    Watson, James E. M.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 10 : 32 - 42
  • [26] Increasing the Impact of Conservation Projects
    Dietz, Lou Ann
    Brown, Marcia
    Swaminathan, Vinaya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2010, 72 (05) : 425 - 440
  • [27] Hybridization and the species problem in conservation
    Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M.
    Ryan, Maureen E.
    Johnson, Jarrett R.
    Corush, Joel
    Carter, Evin T.
    [J]. CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2015, 61 (01) : 206 - 216
  • [28] Guidelines for planning genomic assessment and monitoring of locally adaptive variation to inform species conservation
    Flanagan, Sarah P.
    Forester, Brenna R.
    Latch, Emily K.
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Hoban, Sean
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 11 (07): : 1035 - 1052
  • [29] High levels of interspecific gene flow in an endemic cichlid fish adaptive radiation from an extreme lake environment
    Ford, Antonia G. P.
    Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K.
    Rueber, Lukas
    Gharbi, Karim
    Cezard, Timothee
    Day, Julia J.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2015, 24 (13) : 3421 - 3440
  • [30] Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression
    Frankham, Richard
    Ballou, Jonathan D.
    Eldridge, Mark D. B.
    Lacy, Robert C.
    Ralls, Katherine
    Dudash, Michele R.
    Fenster, Charles B.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 465 - 475