The majority of 922 prediction models supporting breast cancer decision- making are at high risk of bias

被引:9
作者
Hueting, Tom A. [1 ]
van Maaren, Marissa C. [1 ,2 ]
Hendriks, Mathijs P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koffijberg, Hendrik [1 ]
Siesling, Sabine [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Tech Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Dept Res & Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Northwest Clin, Dept Med Oncol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, POB 19079, NL-3501 DB Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Twente, Tech Med Ctr, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Clinical prediction models; Treatment decision support; Breast cancer; Systematic review; Risk of bias; Nomograms; Prognostic models; VALIDATION; PROGNOSIS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To systematically review the currently available prediction models that may support treatment decision-making in breast cancer.Study Design and Setting: Literature was systematically searched to identify studies reporting on development of prediction models aiming to support breast cancer treatment decision-making, published between January 2010 and December 2020. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias (ROB) Assessment Tool (PROBAST).Results: After screening 20,460 studies, 534 studies were included, reporting on 922 models. The 922 models predicted: mortality (n = 417 45%), recurrence (n = 217, 24%), lymph node involvement (n = 141, 15%), adverse events (n = 58, 6%), treatment response (n = 56, 6%), or other outcomes (n = 33, 4%). In total, 285 models (31%) lacked a complete description of the final model and could not be applied to new patients. Most models (n = 878, 95%) were considered to contain high ROB.Conclusion: A substantial overlap in predictor variables and outcomes between the models was observed. Most models were not reported according to established reporting guidelines or showed methodological flaws during the development and/or validation of the model. Further development of prediction models with thorough quality and validity assessment is an essential first step for future clinical application.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 247
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, Medical Devices Regulation. EU2017/745
  • [2] Reading the prognosis of the individual with breast cancer
    Blamey, R. W.
    Pinder, S. E.
    Ball, G. R.
    Ellis, I. O.
    Elston, C. W.
    Mitchell, M. J.
    Haybittle, J. L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (10) : 1545 - 1547
  • [3] Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
    Buscemi, Nina
    Harding, Lisa
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Tjosvold, Lisa
    Klassen, Terry P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) : 697 - 703
  • [4] Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
    Cardoso, F.
    Kyriakides, S.
    Ohno, S.
    Penault-Llorca, F.
    Poortmans, P.
    Rubio, I. T.
    Zackrisson, S.
    Senkus, E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (08) : 1194 - 1220
  • [5] Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698]
  • [6] Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
    Damen, Johanna A. A. G.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Schuit, Ewoud
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Tzoulaki, Ioanna
    Lassale, Camille M.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Chiocchia, Virginia
    Roberts, Corran
    Schlussel, Michael Maia
    Gerry, Stephen
    Black, James A.
    Heus, Pauline
    van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
    Peelen, Linda M.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
  • [7] Accuracy of the online prognostication tools PREDICT and Adjuvant! for early-stage breast cancer patients younger than 50 years
    Engelhardt, Ellen G.
    van den Broek, Alexandra J.
    Linn, Sabine C.
    Wishart, Gordon C.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    van de Velde, Anthonie O.
    Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Siesling, Sabine
    Brinkhuis, Mariel
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Westenend, Pieter J.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    van Leeuwen, Flora E.
    van 't Veer, Laura J.
    Ravdin, Peter M.
    Pharaoh, Paul D. P.
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 78 : 37 - 44
  • [8] Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews
    Geersing, Geert-Jan
    Bouwmeester, Walter
    Zuithoff, Peter
    Spijker, Rene
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Moons, Karel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [9] Improved web-based calculators for predicting breast carcinoma outcomes
    Michaelson, James S.
    Chen, L. Leon
    Bush, Devon
    Fong, Allan
    Smith, Barbara
    Younger, Jerry
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 128 (03) : 827 - 835
  • [10] Prognostic models for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Minh Tung Phung
    Tin, Sandar Tin
    Elwood, J. Mark
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)