Phase II trial of capecitabine plus erlotinib versus capecitabine alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

被引:10
作者
Vincent, Mark D. [1 ,2 ]
Breadner, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Soulieres, Denis [3 ]
Kerr, Ian G. [1 ,2 ]
Sanatani, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Kocha, Walter [1 ,2 ]
Klimo, Peter [4 ]
MacKenzie, Mary J. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connell, Anne [1 ]
Whiston, Frances [1 ]
Malpage, Anne S. [1 ]
Stitt, Larry [1 ]
Welch, Stephen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Reg Canc Program, London, ON, Canada
[2] Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Lions Gate Hosp, Med oncol, N Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
capecitabine; colorectal cancer; elderly; erlotinib; frail; KRAS; primary tumor location; CELL LUNG-CANCER; WILD-TYPE KRAS; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; OPEN-LABEL; RAS MUTATIONS; CETUXIMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; PANITUMUMAB; OXALIPLATIN; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.2217/fon-2016-0444
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim & methods: Capecitabine monotherapy as palliation for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally well tolerated. Adding erlotinib, an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, might improve efficacy versus capecitabine alone. 82 patients received capecitabine alone (Arm 1) or capecitabine with erlotinib (Arm 2). Results: Median time-to-progression (TTP) in Arm 1 was 7.9 months versus 9.2 in Arm 2. In KRAS-wild type (WT) patients TTP was 8.4 and 11.7 months in Arms 1 and 2, respectively. In KRAS-mutated patients TTP was 7.4 and 1.9 months in Arms 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.023). Arm 2 KRAS-WT patients, left-sided primaries, had an overall survival of 16.0 versus 12.1 months in right-sided primaries. Conclusion: Adding erlotinib to capecitabine increased TTP by 3.2 months in KRAS-WT patients. This study suggests that erlotinib harms patients with KRAS-mutated advanced CRC while it may provide benefit to those with KRAS-WT CRC. Further study of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with left-sided KRAS-WT CRC is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 786
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: Testing for KRAS Gene Mutations in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to Predict Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
    Allegra, Carmen J.
    Jessup, J. Milburn
    Somerfield, Mark R.
    Hamilton, Stanley R.
    Hammond, Elizabeth H.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    McAllister, Pamela K.
    Morton, Roscoe F.
    Schilsky, Richard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (12) : 2091 - 2096
  • [2] Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Amado, Rafael G.
    Wolf, Michael
    Peeters, Marc
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Siena, Salvatore
    Freeman, Daniel J.
    Juan, Todd
    Sikorski, Robert
    Suggs, Sid
    Radinsky, Robert
    Patterson, Scott D.
    Chang, David D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (10) : 1626 - 1634
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, CAN CANC STAT 2008
  • [4] [Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
  • [5] [Anonymous], CAN CANC STAT 2012
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, SEER CANC STAT FACTS
  • [7] [Anonymous], CURR ONCOL
  • [8] Biostatistics Primer What a Clinician Ought to Know: Hazard Ratios
    Barraclough, Helen
    Simms, Lorinda
    Govindan, Ramaswamy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : 978 - 982
  • [9] Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study
    Bokemeyer, C.
    Bondarenko, I.
    Hartmann, J. T.
    de Braud, F.
    Schuch, G.
    Zubel, A.
    Celik, I.
    Schlichting, M.
    Koralewski, P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (07) : 1535 - 1546
  • [10] Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17
    Brule, S. Y.
    Jonker, D. J.
    Karapetis, C. S.
    O'Callaghan, C. J.
    Moore, M. J.
    Wong, R.
    Tebbutt, N. C.
    Underhill, Cr.
    Yip, D.
    Zalcberg, J. R.
    Tu, D.
    Goodwin, R. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (11) : 1405 - 1414