Online Focus Groups

被引:177
作者
Stewart, David W. [1 ]
Shamdasani, Prem [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Marymount Univ, Mkt & Business Law, 1 LMU Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, UCLA NUS Execut MBA Program, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, APEX MBA English Program, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, Mkt, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
FACE-TO-FACE;
D O I
10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rise of Web 2.0, the advent of greater bandwidth, and new technology platforms have made it possible to extend the range of focus-group research to the online environment. This provides advertising researchers, advertising agencies, and advertisers with opportunities to reach consumers who were heretofore difficult to reach, to create groups with new and different compositions, and to use online collaborative tools not readily available in face-to-face groups. This article reviews online focus-group research, identifies several types of online groups, and contrasts the uses and results of online focus groups with the uses and results of face-to-face focus groups. The article concludes that online and face-to-face venues for focus-group research are complementary, with online focus-group research opening new opportunities for gathering data to inform advertising research, theory, and decision making. The article also suggests that differences between online focus-group research and face-to-face focus-group research, with respect to group interaction and the ability to obtain information, are being eroded as technology provides greater opportunities to create social presence in an online environment.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 60
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Finding Friends Online: Online Activities by Deaf Students and Their Well-Being [J].
Blom, Helen ;
Marschark, Marc ;
Vervloed, Mathijs P. J. ;
Knoors, Harry .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[42]   Adult learners' social connectedness and online participation: the importance of online interaction quality [J].
Diep, Anh Nguyet ;
Zhu, Chang ;
Cocquyt, Celine ;
De Greef, Maurice ;
Vanwing, Tom .
STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (03) :326-346
[43]   Investigating students' learning approaches, perceptions of online discussions, and students' online and academic performance [J].
Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 68 :345-352
[44]   Let's Shop Online Together: An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Online Shopping Support [J].
Zhu, Lei ;
Benbasat, Izak ;
Jiang, Zhenhui .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (04) :872-891
[45]   Study methods and learning groups: Research on virtual and face-to-face groups [J].
Severino, Sergio .
INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02) :2894-2901
[46]   Going Online: The Affordances of Online Counseling for Families Affected by Alcohol and Other Drug Issues [J].
Dilkes-Frayne, Ella ;
Savic, Michael ;
Carter, Adrian ;
Kokanovic, Renata ;
Lubman, Dan I. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (14) :2010-2022
[47]   Are online exams an invitation to cheat? [J].
Harmon, Oskar R. ;
Lambrinos, James .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2008, 39 (02) :116-125
[48]   Counsellors' experiences of online therapy [J].
Khan, Shereen ;
Shapka, Jennifer D. ;
Domene, Jose F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2022, 50 (01) :43-65
[49]   An online premium? Characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students in Principles of Microeconomics [J].
Dendir, Seife .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2016, 91 (02) :59-68
[50]   A value perspective on online review platforms: Profiling preference structures of online shops and traditional companies [J].
Koenig, Tatjana Maria ;
Hein, Nika ;
Nimsgern, Vivien .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 145 :387-401