Online Focus Groups

被引:162
作者
Stewart, David W. [1 ]
Shamdasani, Prem [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Marymount Univ, Mkt & Business Law, 1 LMU Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, UCLA NUS Execut MBA Program, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, APEX MBA English Program, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, Mkt, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
FACE-TO-FACE;
D O I
10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rise of Web 2.0, the advent of greater bandwidth, and new technology platforms have made it possible to extend the range of focus-group research to the online environment. This provides advertising researchers, advertising agencies, and advertisers with opportunities to reach consumers who were heretofore difficult to reach, to create groups with new and different compositions, and to use online collaborative tools not readily available in face-to-face groups. This article reviews online focus-group research, identifies several types of online groups, and contrasts the uses and results of online focus groups with the uses and results of face-to-face focus groups. The article concludes that online and face-to-face venues for focus-group research are complementary, with online focus-group research opening new opportunities for gathering data to inform advertising research, theory, and decision making. The article also suggests that differences between online focus-group research and face-to-face focus-group research, with respect to group interaction and the ability to obtain information, are being eroded as technology provides greater opportunities to create social presence in an online environment.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 60
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   EMBODIMENT ONLINE AND INTERACTION IN MASSIVELY MULTIPLAYER ONLINE GAMES [J].
Tietz, Alessandro .
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM EUROPEAN SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISTS: CONFLICT AND COOPERATION, 2015, 45 :119-136
[32]   Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring [J].
Dendir, Seife ;
Maxwell, R. Stockton .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2020, 2
[33]   Are mindfulness groups more mindful face to face or online? A comparison of delivering a mindfulness based well-being group for parents of children with a chronic health condition [J].
Portnoy, Sara ;
Korchak, Gina ;
Foxall, Anna ;
Hurlston, Rosie .
CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 28 (01) :56-69
[34]   Equity in online learning [J].
Tate, Tamara ;
Warschauer, Mark .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 57 (03) :192-206
[35]   Online counselling and therapy [J].
Prescott, Julie .
MENTAL HEALTH AND SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2022, 26 (03) :197-200
[36]   Features and benefits of online counselling: Trinity College online mental health community [J].
Richards, Derek .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2009, 37 (03) :231-242
[37]   The Effect of Attitudes Toward Online Therapy and the Difficulties Perceived in Online Therapeutic Presence [J].
Rathenau, Sara ;
Sousa, Daniel ;
Vaz, Alexandre ;
Geller, Shari .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION, 2022, 32 (01) :19-33
[38]   Impact of online homework on learning in face-to-face and online principles of microeconomics [J].
Dendir, Seife .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2023, 98 (02) :59-67
[39]   Adult learners' social connectedness and online participation: the importance of online interaction quality [J].
Diep, Anh Nguyet ;
Zhu, Chang ;
Cocquyt, Celine ;
De Greef, Maurice ;
Vanwing, Tom .
STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (03) :326-346
[40]   ASSESSING ONLINE LEARNING IN LAW SCHOOLS: STUDENTS SAY ONLINE CLASSES DELIVER [J].
Dutton, Yvonne M. ;
Ryznar, Margaret ;
Long, Kayleigh .
DENVER LAW REVIEW, 2019, 96 (03) :493-534