Understanding the drone epidemic

被引:130
作者
Clarke, Roger [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
RPA; RPAS; UAV; UAVS; Drone control; Drone autonomy; Drone applications; Drone risks;
D O I
10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.002
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Drones are aircraft that have no onboard, human pilot. Through the twentieth century, piloted aircraft made far greater progress than drones. During the twenty-first century, on the other hand, changes in both drone technologies and drone economics have been much more rapid. Particularly in the case of small, inexpensive devices, the question arises as to whether existing regulatory frameworks can cope. To answer that question, it is necessary to document the nature and characteristics of drones, the dimensions across which they vary, the purposes to which they are put, and the impacts that they appear likely to have. The analysis concludes that careful consideration is needed of the adequacy of controls over the impacts of drones on two important values - public safety, and behavioural privacy. (C) 2014 Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 246
页数:17
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]  
Clarke Roger, 2013, NEW MEANING POINT VI
[22]  
Clothier R.A., 2010, P 27 INT C AERONAUTI
[23]  
Coffman K, 2013, DONT DRONES FOLKS DE
[24]  
Coker C, 2013, FINANCIAL TIMES
[25]  
Corcoran M, 2013, ABC NEWS 0519
[26]  
Corcoran M., 2012, ABC NEWS 0519
[27]  
Drew C, 2010, NAMIBIAN 0112
[28]  
Edwards R, 2008, DAILY TELEGRAPH 0506
[29]  
EP, 2013, HUM RIGHTS IMPL US D
[30]  
FAA, 2013, NAT POL UNM AIRCR SY