Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials

被引:506
作者
Quinten, Chantal [1 ]
Coens, Corneel [1 ]
Mauer, Murielle [1 ]
Comte, Sylvie [2 ]
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. [3 ]
Cleeland, Charles [4 ]
Osoba, David [5 ]
Bjordal, Kristin [6 ]
Bottomley, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] EORTC Headquarters, Qual Life Dept, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] UTMD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[5] QOL Consulting, W Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
关键词
ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER; REPORTED OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; SCORES;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70200-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although individual studies show that baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a prognostic factor for survival, contradictory results have been published and very few meta-analyses have confirmed the finding. We examined whether HRQOL scores are associated with survival when pooled across a large sample of patients with different disease sites. Methods We selected 30 randomised controlled trials from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) started between 1986 and 2004, which included survival data for 10108 patients with 11 different cancer sites. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had completed a baseline HRQOL assessment with the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30; n=7417). Sociodemographic variables were age (<= 60 vs >60 years) and sex (men vs women), and clinical variables were WHO performance status (0-1 vs 2-3), distant metastases (no vs yes), and cancer site. We assessed prognostic significance of sociodemographic and clinical variables and the 15 QLQ-C30 scales with Cox proportional hazard models. Findings In the stratified multivariate model including sociodemographic, clinical, and HRQOL data, the HRQOL parameters of physical functioning (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0-96; p<0.0001), pain (1.04, 1.02-1.06; p<0.0001), and appetite loss (1.05, 1.03-1.06; p<0.0001) provided significant prognostic information in addition to the parameters age (1.17, 1.06-1.28; p=0.0001), sex (0.74, 0.67-0.82; p<0.0001), and distant metastases (1.70, 1.49-1.93; p<0.0001), but not for WHO performance status (1.07, 0.97-1.19; p=0.11). Consideration of the three HRQOL parameters and sociodemographic and clinical data increased the predictive accuracy of prognosis of overall survival by 6% relative to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics alone (C statistic for concordance between predicted and observed overall survival 0.68 for sociodemographic and clinical variables, and 0.72 for sociodemographic, clinical, and HRQOL variables). Interpretation The results suggest that HRQOL scales provide prognostic information in addition to that of sociodemographic and clinical measures. This study shows that HRQOL data can help to predict survival in patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 871
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, EORTC QLQ C30 SCORIN
[3]   Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data [J].
Chou, I ;
Norman, AR ;
Cunningham, D ;
Waters, JS ;
Oates, J ;
Ross, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) :2395-2403
[4]  
COLLETTE L, 2000, J CLIN ONCOL, V18, P3768
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V187, P220
[6]  
Dancey J, 1997, QUAL LIFE RES, V6, P151
[7]   Is a patient's self-reported health-related quality of life a prognostic factor for survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients? A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of EORTC study 08975 [J].
Efficace, F. ;
Bottomley, A. ;
Smit, E. F. ;
Lianes, P. ;
Legrand, C. ;
Debruyne, C. ;
Schramel, F. ;
Smit, H. J. ;
Gaafar, R. ;
Biesma, B. ;
Manegold, C. ;
Coens, C. ;
Giaccone, G. ;
Van Meerbeeck, J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (11) :1698-1704
[8]   Does a patient's self-reported health-related quality of life predict survival beyond key biomedical data in advanced colorectal cancer? [J].
Efficace, F ;
Bottomley, A ;
Coens, C ;
Van Steen, K ;
Conroy, T ;
Schöffski, P ;
Schmoll, H ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Köhne, CH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (01) :42-49
[9]   ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF LIFE - A STUDY IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS [J].
GANZ, PA ;
SCHAG, CAC ;
CHENG, HL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (01) :75-86
[10]   The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials [J].
Gotay, Carolyn C. ;
Kawamoto, Crissy T. ;
Bottomley, Andrew ;
Efficace, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (08) :1355-1363