Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:62
作者
Nassiri, Nima [1 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. [2 ]
Natarajan, Shyam [1 ,3 ]
Sharma, Devi S. [1 ]
Huang, Jiaoti [4 ]
Dorey, Frederick J.
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Biomed Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; image-guided biopsy; RESONANCE-ULTRASOUND FUSION; BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TERM OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; ADENOCARCINOMA; CRITERIA; SYSTEM; COHORT; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We sought to determine the rate of upgrading to Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater using targeted biopsy for diagnosis and monitoring in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Study subjects comprised all 259 men, including 196 with Gleason score 3 + 3 and 63 with Gleason score 3 + 4, who were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy from 2009 to 2015 and underwent subsequent fusion biopsy for as long as 4 years of active surveillance. The primary end point was the discovery of Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater prostate cancer. Followup biopsies included targeting of positive sites, which were tracked in an Artemis (TM) device. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine upgrading rates, stratified by initial Gleason score and prostate specific antigen density. Results: Based on a Cox proportional hazard model, men with Gleason score 3 + 4 were 4.65 times more likely to have upgrading than men with an initial Gleason score of 3 + 3 at 3 years (p < 0.01). By the third surveillance year 63% of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 had been upgraded compared with 18.0% who started with Gleason score 3 + 3 (p < 0.01). Of all 33 upgrades 32 (97%) occurred at a magnetic resonance imaging visible or a tracked site of tumor, rather than at a previously negative systematic site. Independent predictors of upgrading were Gleason score 3 + 4, prostate specific antigen density 0.15 ng/ml/ cm 3 or greater and a grade 5 lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. The incidence rate ratio of upgrading (Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 3 + 3) was 4.25 per year of patient followup (p < 0.01). Conclusions: During active surveillance of prostate cancer, targeting of tracked tumor foci by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy allows for heightened detection of Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater cancers. Baseline variables directly related to important upgrading that warrant increased vigilance include Gleason score 3 + 4, prostate specific antigen density 0.15 ng/ml/cm(3) or greater and grade 5 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 639
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Gleason Score 6 Adenocarcinoma: Should It Be Labeled As Cancer? [J].
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Veltri, Robert W. ;
Nelson, William G. ;
Coffey, Donald S. ;
Singer, Eric A. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (35) :4294-4296
[2]   Tumor Target Volume for Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancerd-Does Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Allow for a Reliable Estimation? [J].
Cornud, F. ;
Khoury, Gaby ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Legmann, Paul ;
Delongchamps, Nicolas B. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05) :1272-1279
[3]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[4]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[5]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[6]   Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Select Men for Active Surveillance: Do the Epstein Criteria Still Apply? [J].
Hu, Jim C. ;
Chang, Edward ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Macairan, Malu ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Sonn, Geoffrey ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (02) :385-390
[7]   Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer [J].
Klotz, Laurence ;
Vesprini, Danny ;
Sethukavalan, Perakaa ;
Jethava, Vibhuti ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Jain, Suneil ;
Yamamoto, Toshihiro ;
Mamedov, Alexandre ;
Loblaw, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) :272-U75
[8]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology [J].
Le, Jesse D. ;
Stephenson, Samuel ;
Brugger, Michelle ;
Lu, David Y. ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Sonn, Geoffrey A. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05) :1367-1373
[9]  
MCNEAL JE, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P1225, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1225::AID-CNCR2820660624>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-X