Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals

被引:1698
作者
Asch, DA
Jedrziewski, MK
Christakis, NA
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO, DEPT SOCIOL, CHICAGO, IL 60637 USA
[2] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 USA
[3] UNIV PENN, SCH MED, DIV GEN INTERNAL MED, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; data collection; epidemiology; financial incentives; health services research; mailed survey; research design; response bias; survey methods;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to characterize response rates for mail surveys published in medical journals; to determine how the response rate among subjects who are typical targets of mail surveys varies; and to evaluate the contribution of several techniques used by investigators to enhance response rates. Methods. One hundred seventy-eight manuscripts published in 1991, representing 321 distinct mail surveys, were abstracted to determine response rates and survey techniques. In a follow-up mail survey, 113 authors of these manuscripts provided supplementary information. Results. The mean response rate among mail surveys published in medical journals is approximately 60%. However, response rates vary according to subject studied and techniques used. Published surveys of physicians have a mean response rate of only 54%, and those of non-physicians have a mean response rate of 68%. In addition, multivariable models suggest that written reminders provided with a copy of the instrument and telephone reminders are each associated with response rates about 13% higher than surveys that do not use these techniques. Other techniques, such as anonymity and financial incentives, are not associated with higher response rates. Conclusions. Although several mail survey techniques are associated with higher response rates, response rates to published mail surveys tend to be moderate. However, a survey's response rate is at best an indirect indication of the extent of non-respondent bias. Investigators, journal editors, and readers should devote more attention to assessments of bias, and less to specific response rate thresholds. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1136
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
[2]   RETURN POSTAGE IN MAIL SURVEYS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
LUSK, EJ .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (02) :233-248
[3]   DIFFERENT RESPONSE RATES IN A TRIAL OF 2 ENVELOPE STYLES IN MAIL SURVEY-RESEARCH [J].
ASCH, DA ;
CHRISTAKIS, NA .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :364-365
[4]   PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO A MAILED SURVEY - AN EXPERIMENT IN TIMING OF PAYMENT [J].
BERRY, SH ;
KANOUSE, DE .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (01) :102-114
[5]   THE BEHAVIOR OF RESPONDENTS, NONRESPONDENTS, AND REFUSERS ACROSS MAIL SURVEYS [J].
BRENNAN, M ;
HOEK, J .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1992, 56 (04) :530-535
[6]  
Camunas C, 1990, J N Y State Nurses Assoc, V21, P7
[7]  
Choi B C, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P72, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00015
[8]   ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CHURCH, AH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) :62-79
[9]  
Cohen J, 1984, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, V2, P183
[10]   MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATE - A META-ANALYSIS OF SELECTED TECHNIQUES FOR INDUCING RESPONSE [J].
FOX, RJ ;
CRASK, MR ;
KIM, J .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1988, 52 (04) :467-491