Social choice rules driven by propositional logic

被引:1
作者
Camps, Rosa [1 ]
Mora, Xavier [1 ]
Saumell, Laia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Matemat, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Social choice theory; Degrees of belief; Preferences; Transitivity; Condorcet-Smith principle; Choiceness; Supremacy; Plurality rule; Minimax rule; Prominence; Condorcet principle; Maximin rule; Comprehensive prominence; Refined comprehensive prominence; Goodness; Approval voting; Approval-preferential voting; APPROVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10472-013-9395-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Several rules for social choice are examined from a unifying point of view that looks at them as procedures for revising a system of degrees of belief in accordance with certain specified logical constraints. Belief is here a social attribute, its degrees being measured by the fraction of people who share a given opinion. Different known rules and some new ones are obtained depending on which particular constraints are assumed. These constraints allow to model different notions of choiceness. In particular, we give a new method to deal with approval-disapproval-preferential voting.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 312
页数:34
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Scoring rules for judgment aggregation [J].
Dietrich, Franz .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2014, 42 (04) :873-911
[12]   A measure of distance between judgment sets [J].
Duddy, Conal ;
Piggins, Ashley .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2012, 39 (04) :855-867
[13]   ON COMBINING APPROVAL WITH DISAPPROVAL VOTING [J].
FELSENTHAL, DS .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1989, 34 (01) :53-60
[14]  
Good IrvingJ., 1971, PUBLIC CHOICE, V10, P97
[15]  
Hansson SvenOve., 2006, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[16]   The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review [J].
List, Christian .
SYNTHESE, 2012, 187 (01) :179-207
[17]  
List Christian., 2009, HDB RATIONAL SOCIAL, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199290420.003.0020
[18]   Characterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context [J].
Luis Garcia-Lapresta, Jose ;
Marley, A. A. J. ;
Martinez-Panero, Miguel .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2010, 34 (03) :487-496
[19]  
Nitzan S., 2009, COLLECTIVE PREFERENC
[20]  
Quine W.V.O., 1970, WEB BELIEF