Estimation of rainfall erosivity (R) using Geo-spatial technique for the state of Tripura, India: A comparative study

被引:1
作者
Das, Susanta [1 ,2 ]
Das, Ranjit [1 ]
Bora, Pradip Kumar [1 ,3 ]
Olaniya, Manish [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Space Applicat Ctr, Umiam 793103, Meghalaya, India
[2] Punjab Agr Univ, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[3] North Eastern Reg Inst Water & Land Management, Tezpur, Assam, India
[4] Cent Agr Univ, Umiam, Meghalaya, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 92卷 / 07期
关键词
Rainfall erosivity; Spatial variation; Temporal variation; Tripura; SOIL-EROSION; GIS;
D O I
10.56093/ijas.v92i7.104246
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The principal-agent of soil detachment is rainfall kinetic energy (KE), which must be assessed to understand the nature of erosion, particularly in high rainfall regions, and is designated as a rainfall erosivity index (R). The present study aimed to develop and choose an appropriate model for estimating the R factor in the Indian state of Tripura. The study employed the following three models: KE>25 index model, average annual rainfall model, and monthly and average annual rainfall model. The rainfall data were collected from MOSDAC and https://www. worldweatheronline.com for the calculation of point R-value. The interpolation technique (Kriging) in the ArcGIS environment was adopted to find the spatial variation of the rainfall and R factor over the region. The average annual R factor of the study area was 1089.89, 533.17, and 2452.27 MJ mm/ha/h/y as calculated by Model-1, Model-2, and Model-3, respectively, for the study period (2008-17). The results show that Tripura has high rainfall erosivity which may lead to soil erosion. The comparative analysis shows Model-2 has underestimated approximately 70% whereas Model-3 has overestimated about 15% of the R factor values by considering Model-1 as base. The results demonstrate that Model-2 can be used as an alternative for estimation of rainfall erosivity in an area where the daily rainfall data is not available. These findings may help researchers to select a suitable method for the calculation of rainf all erosivity factor in mountainous catchments.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 835
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Estimating rainfall erosivity from daily precipitation records: A comparison among methods using data from the Ebro Basin (NE Spain) [J].
Angulo-Martinez, M. ;
Begueria, S. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 379 (1-2) :111-121
[2]  
Arnoldus H. M. J., 1980, Assessment of Erosion., P127
[3]   Rainfall erosivity in Central Chile [J].
Bonilla, Carlos A. ;
Vidal, Karim L. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 410 (1-2) :126-133
[4]  
Chauhan N, 2020, MUKT SHABD J, V9, P221
[5]   Comparison of RUSLE and MMF Soil Loss Models and Evaluation of Catchment Scale Best Management Practices for a Mountainous Watershed in India [J].
Das, Susanta ;
Deb, Proloy ;
Bora, Pradip Kumar ;
Katre, Prafull .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) :1-22
[6]   Rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in Eastern Ghats Highland of east India [J].
Dash, Ch Jyotiprava ;
Das, N. K. ;
Adhikary, Partha Pratim .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 97 (02) :727-746
[7]   Assessing and modelling changes in rainfall erosivity at different climate scales [J].
Diodato, N. ;
Bellocchi, G. .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2009, 34 (07) :969-980
[8]   Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS - A case study of Nethravathi Basin [J].
Ganasri, B. P. ;
Ramesh, H. .
GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2016, 7 (06) :953-961
[9]  
Hudson N., 1981, Soil conservation.
[10]  
Karthick P., 2017, International Research Journal of Earth Sciences, V5, P8