Visual adaptation reveals asymmetric spatial frequency tuning for motion

被引:9
作者
Ledgeway, Timothy [1 ]
Hutchinson, Claire V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Visual Neurosci Grp, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Sch Psychol, Leicester, Leics, England
来源
JOURNAL OF VISION | 2009年 / 9卷 / 01期
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
motion-2D; temporal vision; spatial vision; adaptation; motion aftereffect; spatial frequency selectivity; HUMAN VISION; DISCRIMINATION; CONTRAST; SELECTIVITY; MECHANISMS; CHANNELS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1167/9.1.4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
This study investigated the spatial frequency selectivity of the human visual motion system using the technique of adaptation in which motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was taken as an index of aftereffect magnitude. Eight observers adapted to two vertically oriented, oppositely drifting, luminance-defined gratings that were spatially separated in the vertical dimension. The spatial frequency of the adaptation patterns spanned a 3-octave range (0.25 to 2 c/deg) and drifted at 5 Hz. Following adaptation (20 s), two stationary test patterns were presented and MAE duration was measured. The spatial frequency difference between the adaptation and test patterns was varied from -2.5 to 2.5 octaves in 0.5 octave steps. MAE tuning functions at the lowest adaptation frequency (0.25 c/deg) were bandpass and reasonably symmetric. However, as the spatial frequency of the adaptation patterns increased, overall MAE duration decreased and the shape of the tuning functions became markedly asymmetric. This asymmetry was characterized by a MAE peak that was centered similar to 1 octave below the adaptation frequency. The results are consistent with recent masking studies (C. V. Hutchinson & T. Ledgeway, 2007) and may reflect either asymmetric spatial frequency selectivity of underlying motion units or frequency-specific interactions (e.g. inhibition) between motion sensors tuned to different spatial frequencies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   STRIATE CORTEX RESPONSES TO PERIODIC PATTERNS WITH AND WITHOUT THE FUNDAMENTAL HARMONICS [J].
ALBRECHT, DG ;
DEVALOIS, RL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1981, 319 (OCT) :497-514
[2]   SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SELECTIVITY OF THE HUMAN MOTION DETECTION SYSTEM [J].
ANDERSON, SJ ;
BURR, DC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1985, 25 (08) :1147-1154
[3]   DIFFERENCE OF SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY BETWEEN STATIC AND FLICKER MOTION AFTEREFFECTS [J].
ASHIDA, H ;
OSAKA, N .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (11) :1313-1320
[4]   MOTION AFTEREFFECT WITH FLICKERING TEST STIMULI DEPENDS ON ADAPTING VELOCITY [J].
ASHIDA, H ;
OSAKA, N .
VISION RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (13) :1825-1833
[5]  
BARFIELD LP, 1976, J PHYSL, V254, P67
[6]   Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect [J].
Bex, PJ ;
Verstraten, FAJ ;
Mareschal, I .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (17) :2721-2727
[7]   SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT [J].
CAMERON, EL ;
BAKER, CL ;
BOULTON, JC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (03) :561-568
[8]   Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: Limitations and implications [J].
Castet, Eric ;
Keeble, David R. T. ;
Verstraten, Frans A. J. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2002, 2 (04) :302-311
[9]   DIRECTION DISCRIMINATION FOR BAND-PASS FILTERED RANDOM DOT KINEMATOGRAMS [J].
CLEARY, R ;
BRADDICK, OJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1990, 30 (02) :303-&
[10]  
Culham J, 1998, MOTION AFTEREFFECT, P85