Bayesian estimates of parameter variability in the k-ε turbulence model

被引:165
作者
Edeling, W. N. [1 ,2 ]
Cinnella, P. [1 ]
Dwight, R. P. [2 ]
Bijl, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] ENSAM ParisTech, DynFluid Lab, F-75013 Paris, France
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Bayesian calibration; Parameter variability; Model inadequacy; RANS turbulence model; Global sensitivity analysis; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; WALL; CALIBRATION; FLOW; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.027
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we are concerned with obtaining estimates for the error in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations based on the Launder-Sharma k-epsilon turbulence closure model, for a limited class of flows. In particular we search for estimates grounded in uncertainties in the space of model closure coefficients, for wall-bounded flows at a variety of favorable and adverse pressure gradients. In order to estimate the spread of closure coefficients which reproduces these flows accurately, we perform 13 separate Bayesian calibrations - each at a different pressure gradient - using measured boundary-layer velocity profiles, and a statistical model containing a multiplicative model-inadequacy term in the solution space. The results are 13 joint posterior distributions over coefficients and hyper-parameters. To summarize this information we compute Highest Posterior-Density (HPD) intervals, and subsequently represent the total solution uncertainty with a probability-box (p-box). This p-box represents both parameter variability across flows, and epistemic uncertainty within each calibration. A prediction of a new boundary-layer flow is made with uncertainty bars generated from this uncertainty information, and the resulting error estimate is shown to be consistent with measurement data. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 94
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P AFOSR IFP STANF C
[2]  
Blottner F. G., 1974, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, V4, P179, DOI 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90033-4
[3]   Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals [J].
Chen, MH ;
Shao, QM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1999, 8 (01) :69-92
[4]   Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling [J].
Cheung, Sai Hung ;
Oliver, Todd A. ;
Prudencio, Ernesto E. ;
Prudhomme, Serge ;
Moser, Robert D. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) :1137-1149
[5]   Uncertainty quantification for porous media flows [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Demyanov, Vasily ;
Erbas, Demet .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 217 (01) :143-158
[6]   Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes [J].
Debusschere, BJ ;
Najm, HN ;
Pébay, PP ;
Knio, OM ;
Ghanem, RG ;
Le Maître, OP .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2004, 26 (02) :698-719
[7]  
Dwight R.P., 2009, AIAA paper 2276, V2009, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2009-2276
[8]  
Ferziger JH, 1996, INT J NUMER METH FL, V23, P1263, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19961230)23:12<1263::AID-FLD478>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-V
[10]   Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution [J].
Freni, Gabriele ;
Mannina, Giorgio .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 392 (1-2) :31-39