Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein-a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients

被引:16
作者
Becker, Felix [1 ]
Wurche, Lennart A. [1 ]
Darscht, Martina [1 ]
Pascher, Andreas [1 ]
Struecker, Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Waldeyerstr 1, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
Seldinger; TIVAP; Oncology; Parenteral nutrition; CEPHALIC VEIN; COMPLICATIONS; SYSTEMS; DEVICES; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-021-02097-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Modern oncological treatment algorithms require a central venous device in form of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP). While most commonly used techniques are surgical cutdown of the cephalic vein or percutaneous puncture of the subclavian vein, there are a relevant number of patients in which an additional strategy is needed. The aim of the current study is to present a surgical technique for TIVAP implantation via an open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein and to characterize risk factors, associated with primary failure as well as short- (< 30 days) and long-term (> 30 days) complications. Methods A total of 500 patients were included and followed up for 12 months. Demographic and intraoperative data and short- as well as long-term complications were extracted. Primary endpoint was TIVAP removal due to complication. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze associated risk factors. Results Surgery was primarily successful in all cases, while success was defined as functional (positive aspiration and infusion test) TIVAP which was implanted via open Seldinger approach of the jugular vein at the intended site. TIVAP removal due to complications during the 1st year occurred in 28 cases (5.6%) while a total of 4 (0.8%) intraoperative complications were noted. Rates for short- and long-term complications were 0.8% and 6.6%, respectively. Conclusion While the presented technique requires relatively long procedure times, it is a safe and reliable method for TIVAP implantation. Our results might help to further introduce the presented technique as a secondary approach in modern TIVAP surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 910
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy-Guided Placement of Central Venous Ports via Internal Jugular Vein: Retrospective Analysis of 1254 Port Implantations at a Single Center [J].
Ahn, Se Jin ;
Kim, Hyo-Cheol ;
Chung, Jin Wook ;
An, Sang Bu ;
Yin, Yong Hu ;
Jae, Hwan Jun ;
Park, Jae Hyung .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 13 (03) :314-323
[2]   Impact of nighttime procedures on outcomes after liver transplantation [J].
Becker, Felix ;
Voss, Thekla ;
Mohr, Annika ;
Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie ;
Schuette-Nuetgen, Katharina ;
Reuter, Stefan ;
Kabar, Iyad ;
Bormann, Eike ;
Vowinkel, Thorsten ;
Palmes, Daniel ;
Brockmann, Jens G. ;
Pascher, Andreas ;
Bahde, Ralf ;
Kebschull, Linus ;
Vogel, Thomas .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07)
[3]   The weekend effect in liver transplantation [J].
Becker, Felix ;
Vogel, Thomas ;
Voss, Thekla ;
Mehdorn, Anne-Sophie ;
Schuette-Nuetgen, Katharina ;
Reuter, Stefan ;
Mohr, Annika ;
Kabar, Iyad ;
Bormann, Eike ;
Vowinkel, Thorsten ;
Palmes, Daniel ;
Senninger, Norbert ;
Bahde, Ralf ;
Kebschull, Linus .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05)
[4]   Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial [J].
Biffi, R. ;
Orsi, F. ;
Pozzi, S. ;
Pace, U. ;
Bonomo, G. ;
Monfardini, L. ;
Della Vigna, P. ;
Rotmensz, N. ;
Radice, D. ;
Zampino, M. G. ;
Fazio, N. ;
de Braud, F. ;
Andreoni, B. ;
Goldhirsch, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (05) :935-940
[5]   External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement [J].
Di Carlo, I ;
Barbagallo, F ;
Toro, A ;
Sofia, M ;
Lombardo, R ;
Cordio, S .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) :570-573
[6]   Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically - A retrospective study on early and late complications [J].
Di Carlo, I ;
Cordio, S ;
La Greca, G ;
Privitera, G ;
Russello, D ;
Puleo, S ;
Latteri, F .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (09) :1050-1053
[7]   Increased Use of Percutaneous Technique for Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices. Is It Real Progress? A 27-Year Comprehensive Review on Early Complications [J].
Di Carlo, Isidoro ;
Pulvirenti, Elia ;
Mannino, Maurizio ;
Toro, Adriana .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1649-1656
[8]   Central Venous Access: Evolving Roles of Radiology and Other Specialties Nationally Over Two Decades [J].
Duszak, Richard, Jr. ;
Bilal, Nadia ;
Picus, Daniel ;
Hughes, Danny R. ;
Xu, Baogang J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (08) :603-612
[9]   Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports [J].
Hsu, Charlie C-T ;
Kwan, Gigi N. C. ;
Evans-Barns, Hannah ;
Rophael, John A. ;
van Driel, Mieke L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (08)
[10]   Primary Open Versus Closed Implantation Strategy for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports The Multicentre Randomized Controlled PORTAS-3 Trial (DRKS 00004900) [J].
Huettner, Felix J. ;
Bruckner, Tom ;
Hackbusch, Matthes ;
Weitz, Juergen ;
Bork, Ulrich ;
Kotschenreuther, Peter ;
Heupel, Oliver ;
Kuemmel, Sabine ;
Schlitt, Hans J. ;
Mattulat, Matthias ;
Pinter, Laszlo ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Gutt, Carsten N. ;
Nottberg, Hubertus S. ;
Pohl, Alexander ;
Ghanem, Firas ;
Meyer, Thomas ;
Imdahl, Andreas ;
Neudecker, Jens ;
Mueller, Verena A. ;
Gehrig, Tobias ;
Reineke, Mario ;
von Frankenberg, Moritz ;
Schumacher, Guido ;
Hennes, Roland ;
Mihaljevic, Andre L. ;
Rossion, Inga ;
Klose, Christina ;
Kieser, Meinhard ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Diener, Markus K. ;
Knebel, Phillip .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (06) :950-960