Impact of crude oil price volatility on economic activities: An empirical investigation in the Thai economy

被引:173
作者
Rafiq, Shuddhasawtta [1 ]
Salim, Ruhul [1 ]
Bloch, Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
Oil price volatility; Thailand; Granger causality test; Impulse response function; Variance decomposition; REAL EXCHANGE-RATES; MACROECONOMY; SHOCKS; INFLATION; MODELS; GDP;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2008.09.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper empirically examines the impact of oil price volatility on key macroeconomic indicators of Thailand. Following Andersen et al. [2004. Analytical evaluation of volatility forecasts. International Economic Review 45(4), 1079-1110], quarterly oil price volatility is measured by using the realized volatility (RV). The impact of the oil price volatility is investigated using the vector auto-regression (VAR) system. The Granger causality test, impulse response functions, and variance decomposition show that oil price volatility has significant impact on macroeconomic indicators, Such as unemployment and investment, over the period from 1993Q1 to 2006Q4. Perron's [1997. Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. journal of Econometrics 80(2), 355-385] test identifies structural breaks in all the concerned variables during the time of the Asian Financial Crisis (1997-1998). A VAR for the post-crisis period shows that the impact of oil price volatility is transmitted to budget deficit. The floating exchange rate regime introduced after the crisis may be the key contributor to this new channel of impact. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 132
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   How often to sample a continuous-time process in the presence of market microstructure noise [J].
Aït-Sahalia, Y ;
Mykland, PA ;
Zhang, L .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2005, 18 (02) :351-416
[2]  
Amano R.A., 1998, REV INT ECON, V6, P683, DOI [10.1111/1467-9396.00136, DOI 10.1111/1467-9396.00136]
[3]   The distribution of realized stock return volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Ebens, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 61 (01) :43-76
[4]   Analytical evaluation of volatility forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Meddahi, N .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 45 (04) :1079-1110
[5]   The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (453) :42-55
[6]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[7]  
[Anonymous], APPL EC
[8]   Non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, OE ;
Shephard, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2001, 63 :167-207
[9]   Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, OE ;
Shephard, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2002, 64 :253-280
[10]   IRREVERSIBILITY, UNCERTAINTY, AND CYCLICAL INVESTMENT [J].
BERNANKE, BS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (01) :85-106