Clinical impact of molecular point-of-care testing for suspected COVID-19 in hospital (COV-19POC): a prospective interventional, non-randomised, controlled study

被引:95
作者
Brendish, Nathan J. [1 ,3 ]
Poole, Stephen [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Naidu, Vasanth V. [3 ]
Mansbridge, Christopher T. [3 ]
Norton, Nicholas J. [3 ]
Wheeler, Helen [4 ]
Presland, Laura [4 ]
Kidd, Stephen [6 ]
Cortes, Nicholas J. [6 ]
Borca, Florina [4 ]
Phan, Hang [4 ]
Babbage, Gavin [5 ]
Visseaux, Benoit [7 ]
Ewings, Sean [2 ]
Clark, Tristan W. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Sch Clin & Expt Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton Clin Trials Unit, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Infect, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Southampton Clin Res Facil, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Hampshire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[7] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Lab Virol, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30454-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background The management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals, these delays lead to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission. Rapid, accurate tests are therefore urgently needed in preparation for the next wave of the pandemic. Methods We did a prospective, interventional, non-randomised, controlled study of molecular point-of-care testing in patients aged 18 years or older presenting with suspected COVID-19 to the emergency department or other acute areas of Southampton General Hospital during the first wave of the pandemic in the UK. Nose and throat swab samples taken at admission from patients in the point-of-care testing group were tested with the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel. Samples taken from patients in a contemporaneous control group were tested by laboratory PCR. The primary outcome was time to results in the full cohort. This study is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14966673) and is completed. Findings Between March 20 and April 29, 2020, 517 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 499 were recruited to the point-of-care testing group and tested by the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel. 555 contemporaneously identified patients were included in the control group and tested by laboratory PCR. The two groups were similar with regard to the distribution of sex, age, and ethnicity. 197 (39%) patients in the point-of-care testing group and 155 (28%) in the control group tested positive for COVID-19 (difference 11.5% [95% CI 5.8-17.2], p=0.0001). Median time to results was 1.7 h (IQR 1.6-1.9) in the point-of-care testing group and 21.3 h (16.0-27.9) in the control group (difference 19.6 h [19.0-20.3], p<0.0001). A Cox proportional hazards regression model controlling for age, sex, time of presentation, and severity of illness also showed that time to results was significantly shorter in the point-of-care testing group than in the control group (hazard ratio 4023 [95% CI 545-29 696], p<0.0001). Interpretation Point-of-care testing is associated with large reductions in time to results and could lead to improvements in infection control measures and patient flow compared with centralised laboratory PCR testing. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1200
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Academy of Medical Sciences, 2020, Preparing for a challenging winter 2020/21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BBC News
[3]  
Beigel JH, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V383, P1813, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc2022236, 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764]
[4]   Impact of turnaround time on outcome with point-of-care testing for respiratory viruses: a post hoc analysis from a randomised controlled trial [J].
Brendish, Nathan J. ;
Malachira, Ahalya K. ;
Beard, Kate R. ;
Ewings, Sean ;
Clark, Tristan W. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52 (02)
[5]  
Brendish NJ, 2017, LANCET RESP MED, V5, P401, DOI [10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30120-0, 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30120-0]
[6]   Improved Molecular Diagnosis of COVID-19 by the Novel, Highly Sensitive and Specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay Validated In Vitro and with Clinical Specimens [J].
Chan, Jasper Fuk-Woo ;
Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan ;
To, Kelvin Kai-Wang ;
Tang, Tommy Hing-Cheung ;
Wong, Sally Cheuk-Ying ;
Leung, Kit-Hang ;
Fung, Agnes Yim-Fong ;
Ng, Anthony Chin-Ki ;
Zou, Zijiao ;
Tsoi, Hoi-Wah ;
Choi, Garnet Kwan-Yue ;
Tam, Anthony Raymond ;
Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung ;
Chan, Kwok-Hung ;
Tsang, Owen Tak-Yin ;
Yuen, Kwok-Yung .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (05)
[7]   Improved sensitivity using a dual target, E and RdRp assay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Experience at a large NHS Foundation Trust in the UK [J].
Colton, Hayley ;
Ankcorn, Michael ;
Yavuz, Mehmet ;
Tovey, Leeanne ;
Cope, Alison ;
Raza, Mohammad ;
Keeley, Alexander J. ;
State, Amy ;
Poller, Bozena ;
Parker, Matthew ;
de Silva, Thushan I. ;
Evans, Cariad .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (01) :181-183
[8]   Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR (Publication with Expression of Concern) [J].
Corman, Victor M. ;
Landt, Olfert ;
Kaiser, Marco ;
Molenkamp, Richard ;
Meijer, Adam ;
Chu, Daniel K. W. ;
Bleicker, Tobias ;
Bruenink, Sebastian ;
Schneider, Julia ;
Schmidt, Marie Luisa ;
Mulders, Daphne G. J. C. ;
Haagmans, Bart L. ;
van der Veer, Bas ;
van den Brink, Sharon ;
Wijsman, Lisa ;
Goderski, Gabriel ;
Romette, Jean-Louis ;
Ellis, Joanna ;
Zambon, Maria ;
Peiris, Malik ;
Goossens, Herman ;
Reusken, Chantal ;
Koopmans, Marion P. G. ;
Drosten, Christian .
EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (03) :23-30
[9]  
Harding L., 2020, 20 HOSP PATIENTS COV
[10]  
Horby P, 2021, NEW ENGL J MED, V384, P693, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa2021436, 10.1056/NEJMoa2022926]