Anger Rumination Scale: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version

被引:10
作者
Satici, Seydi Ahmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Univ, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitisu, TR-26470 Eskisehir, Turkey
来源
ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2014年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
anger rumination; scale adaptation; validity; reliability; FORGIVENESS; FORGIVINGNESS; VENGEFULNESS; DEPRESSION; CATHARSIS; THOUGHT;
D O I
10.5455/apd.42654
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Anger Rumination Scale (ARS). Methods: The first phase of this study was conducted with 405 students from Sakarya University and the second phase was conducted with 544 students from Anadolu University. In the first phase, language equivalance, exploratory factor analysis, the internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were employed. The next phase, confirmatory factor analysis and concurrent validity were employed. Results: The total variance explained was 52% and factor loadings ranged from 0.35 to 0.86. Fit index values of the model were chi(2)=420, chi(2)/df=2.88, CFI=0.90, GFI=0.90 RMSEA=0.06, and SRMR=0.05. Internal consistencies varied between 0.64 and 0.78 and test-retest reliability coefficients ranged between 0.79 and 0.86 for four subscales. ARS was negatively corerelated with life satisfaction and positively correlated with vengeance. Conclusions: Overall findings demonstrated that this scale had high validity and reliability scores and that it may be used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess tendency to anger rumination. Nevertheless, further studies that will use ARS are important for its measurement force.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 334
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Angry memories and thoughts of revenge: The relationship between forgiveness and anger rumination [J].
Barber, L ;
Maltby, J ;
Macaskill, A .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 39 (02) :253-262
[2]  
Beck A.T., 1982, Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects
[3]   Dispositional forgivingness: Development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF) [J].
Berry, JW ;
Worthington, EL ;
Parrott, L ;
O'Conner, LE ;
Wade, NG .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2001, 27 (10) :1277-1290
[4]  
Brislin R.W., 1981, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, P389
[5]   Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding [J].
Bushman, BJ ;
Baumeister, RF ;
Phillips, CM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :17-32
[6]   Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding [J].
Bushman, BJ .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (06) :724-731
[7]  
Buyukozturk S., 2007, Sosyal Bilimler icin Veri Analizi El Kitabi
[8]  
Buyukozturk S., 2004, EDUC SCI-THEOR PRACT, V4, P207
[9]   Fueling the flames of the green-eyed monster: The role of ruminative thought in reaction to romantic jealousy [J].
Carson, CL ;
Cupach, WR .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2000, 64 (03) :308-329
[10]   On assessing individual differences in Rumination on sadness [J].
Conway, M ;
Csank, PAR ;
Holm, SL ;
Blake, CK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2000, 75 (03) :404-425