A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public

被引:0
作者
Smit, Amelia K. [1 ]
Espinoza, David [2 ]
Newson, Ainsley J. [3 ]
Morton, Rachael L. [2 ]
Fenton, Georgina [1 ,4 ]
Freeman, Lucinda [1 ,4 ]
Dunlop, Kate [4 ]
Butow, Phyllis N. [5 ]
Law, Matthew H. [6 ]
Kimlin, Michael G. [7 ,8 ]
Keogh, Louise A. [9 ]
Dobbinson, Suzanne J. [10 ]
Kirk, Judy [11 ,12 ]
Kanetsky, Peter A. [13 ]
Mann, Graham J. [14 ,15 ]
Cust, Anne E. [1 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Canc Epidemiol & Prevent Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Ctr Values Eth & Law Med, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] NSW Hlth, Ctr Genet Educ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decision Making, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Stat Genet, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Canc Council Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[10] Canc Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Westmead Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[12] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Westmead Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[13] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Canc Epidemiol Program, Tampa, FL USA
[14] Univ Sydney, Canc Res Ctr, Westmead Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[15] Univ Sydney, Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GENETIC RISK; SKIN-CANCER; MC1R GENOTYPE; EXPOSURE; PERCEPTIONS; PREVENTION; MEDIATION; TELEPHONE; FAMILIES; COHORT;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0395
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Communication of personalized melanoma genomic risk information may improve melanoma prevention behaviors. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of communicating personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public and its preliminary impact on behaviors and psychosocial outcomes. One hundred eighteen people aged 22 to 69 years provided a saliva sample and were randomized to the control (non-personalized educational materials) or intervention (personalized booklet presenting melanoma genomic risk as absolute and relative risks and a risk category based on variants in 21 genes, telephone-based genetic counseling, and nonpersonalized educational materials). Intention-to-treat analyses overall and by-risk category were conducted using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. Results: Consent to participate was 41%, 99% were successfully genotyped, and 92% completed 3-month follow-up. Intervention participants reported high satisfaction with the personalized book-let (mean = 8.6, SD = 1.6; on a 0-10 scale) and genetic counseling (mean = 8.1, SD = 2.2). No significant behavioral effects at 3-month follow-up were identified between intervention and control groups overall: objectively measured standard erythemal doses per day [-16%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -43% to 24%] and sun protection index (0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.18). There was increased confidence identifying melanoma at 3 months (0.40; 95% CI, 0.10-0.69). Stratified by risk category, effect sizes for intentional tanning and some individual sun protection items appeared stronger for the average-risk group. There were no appreciable group differences in skin cancer-related worry or psychologic distress. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of providing personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public. Impact: Genomic risk information has potential as a melanoma prevention strategy. (C)2016 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 221
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MENT HLTH SERV BRIEF
[2]   HOW MUCH MELANOMA IS CAUSED BY SUN EXPOSURE [J].
ARMSTRONG, BK ;
KRICKER, A .
MELANOMA RESEARCH, 1993, 3 (06) :395-401
[3]   Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention [J].
Aspinwall, Lisa G. ;
Stump, Tammy K. ;
Taber, Jennifer M. ;
Kohlmann, Wendy ;
Leaf, Samantha L. ;
Leachman, Sancy A. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 38 (05) :754-765
[4]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2008, NONM SKIN CANC GEN P
[5]   Mediation of improvements in sun protective and skin self-examination behaviours: results from the healthy text study [J].
Baker, Jannah ;
Finch, Linda ;
Soyer, H. Peter ;
Marshall, Alison L. ;
Baade, Peter ;
Youl, Philippa ;
Janda, Monika .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) :28-35
[6]   Cohort profile: The 45 and up study [J].
Banks, Emily ;
Redman, Sally ;
Jorm, Louisa ;
Armstrong, Bruce ;
Bauman, Adrian ;
Beard, John ;
Beral, Valerie ;
Byles, Julie ;
Corbett, Stephen ;
Cumming, Robert ;
Harris, Mark ;
Sitas, Freddy ;
Smith, Wayne ;
Taylor, Lee ;
Wutzke, Sonia ;
Lujic, Sanja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (05) :941-947
[7]   Telephoned BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Results: Prevalence, Practice, and Patient Satisfaction [J].
Baumanis, L. ;
Evans, J. P. ;
Callanan, N. ;
Susswein, L. R. .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2009, 18 (05) :447-463
[8]   PERFORMANCE OF A 5-ITEM MENTAL-HEALTH SCREENING-TEST [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
MURPHY, JM ;
GOLDMAN, PA ;
WARE, JE ;
BARSKY, AJ ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (02) :169-176
[9]   MITF E318K's effect on melanoma risk independent of, but modified by, other risk factors [J].
Berwick, Marianne ;
MacArthur, Jamie ;
Orlow, Irene ;
Kanetsky, Peter ;
Begg, Colin B. ;
Luo, Li ;
Reiner, Anne ;
Sharma, Ajay ;
Armstrong, Bruce K. ;
Kricker, Anne ;
Cust, Anne E. ;
Marrett, Loraine D. ;
Gruber, Stephen B. ;
Anton-Culver, Hoda ;
Zanetti, Roberto ;
Rosso, Stefano ;
Gallagher, Richard P. ;
Dwyer, Terence ;
Venn, Alison ;
Busam, Klaus ;
From, Lynn ;
White, Kirsten ;
Thomas, Nancy E. .
PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (03) :485-488
[10]  
Blais AR, 2006, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V1, P33