If You Give Bureaucrats an Inch, Will They Take a Yard? Lessons from Threshold Regulatory Reform in Italy

被引:2
作者
Castro, Massimo Finocchiaro [1 ]
Guccio, Calogero [2 ,3 ]
Romeo, Domenica [2 ]
机构
[1] Mediterranean Univ Reggio Calabria, Dept Law Econ & Humanities, Reggio Di Calabria, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, I-94015 Catania, Italy
关键词
bureaucratic discretion; public service norms; corruption; public works contracts; efficiency; nonparametric methods; PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; INSTITUTIONS; GOVERNMENT; EFFICIENCY; QUALITY; MODELS; WASTE; WORKS; CORRUPTION;
D O I
10.1177/10911421221138438
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The role of discretion in public procurement has been the subject of wide debate in regulation literature and practice. Greater discretion potentially may allow for greater efficiency in procurement. However, when social capital and institutional quality are low, more discretion can easily open the door to bribery and corruption. In this paper, adopting a semiparametric approach and using a large dataset of public works managed by Italian municipalities, we empirically assess the effects of a reform in the regulation of public works in Italy, approved in 2011, that has increased the discretion of bureaucrats in the choice of the firms. The results provide evidence that the reform has exerted a positive, although mild, effect on the performance of public works execution. However, the positive role of the reform is more relevant in those areas where the effect of public service norms and prosocial behaviors are higher.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 764
页数:38
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Social capital, quality of institutions and lockdown. Evidence from Italian provinces
    Alfano, Vincenzo
    Ercolano, Salvatore
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2021, 59 : 31 - 41
  • [2] ANAC, 2014, REL ANN PARL 2013
  • [3] THE ROLE OF FIRMS' QUALIFICATION IN PUBLIC CONTRACTS EXECUTION: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT
    Ancarani, Alessandro
    Guccio, Calogero
    Rizzo, Ilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2016, 16 (04) : 554 - 582
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, Government at a glance 2021, DOI [DOI 10.1787/1C258F55-EN, https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en]
  • [5] Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models: the state of the art
    Badin, Luiza
    Daraio, Cinzia
    Simar, Leopold
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 214 (01) : 5 - 30
  • [6] Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis
    Bajari, Patrick
    McMillan, Robert
    Tadelis, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 25 (02) : 372 - 399
  • [7] To bid or not to bid: That is the question: Public procurement, project complexity and corruption
    Baldi, Simona
    Bottasso, Anna
    Conti, Maurizio
    Piccardo, Chiara
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 43 : 89 - 106
  • [8] Discretion and Supplier Selection in Public Procurement
    Baltrunaite, Audinga
    Giorgiantonio, Cristina
    Mocetti, Sauro
    Orlando, Tommaso
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 37 (01) : 134 - 167
  • [9] Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment
    Bandiera, Oriana
    Prat, Andrea
    Valletti, Tommaso
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) : 1278 - 1308
  • [10] Social capital and the spread of covid-19: Insights from european countries
    Bartscher, Alina Kristin
    Seitz, Sebastian
    Siegloch, Sebastian
    Slotwinski, Ichaela
    Wehrhoefer, Nils
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 80