Estimation of PGR Induced Absolute Gravity Changes at Greenland GNET Stations

被引:2
作者
Nielsen, Emil [1 ]
Strykowski, Gabriel [1 ]
Forsberg, Rene [1 ]
Madsen, Finn Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] DTU Space Geodynam, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] DTU Space Geodesy, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
EARTH ON THE EDGE: SCIENCE FOR A SUSTAINABLE PLANET | 2014年 / 139卷
关键词
Greenland; Postglacial rebound; Absolute gravity; ICE-5G VM2; MODEL; SEA; LEVEL; EARTH; PREDICTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_12
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
An important subject in the climate debate is the study of the major ice sheets mass balance. Knowledge of the mass balance provides understanding of changes in the relative sea-level (RSL). Several methods are used for mass balance studies but they are associated with large uncertainties. One reason for the uncertainty is the presence of the postglacial rebound (PGR) signal in the geodetic data used for mass balance estimates. Estimates of the PGR signal can be obtained by modelling and then being subtracted from the data to eliminate its influence. In this study, the PGR gravity signal will be investigated through modelling. The modelling of seven different scenarios shows that the PGR gravity signal in Greenland is less then 1 mu Gal/year (1 mu Gal=10 nm/s(2)). Repeated absolute gravity (AG) measurements at selected Greenland network (GNET) GPS sites were initiated in 2009. These data will in the future help constrain PGR and present-day ice mass changes. The data is collected with an A10 absolute gravimeter, which has an accuracy of 10 mu Gal (manufacturer specification). Here we will evaluate themodelled PGR gravity signal at selected GNET sites and conclude that the signal is significantly smaller then the gravity instruments accuracy and a long time is needed to detect it. Also, it can be expected that the elastic signal will be larger and other data like GPS is needed to separate the viscous and elastic signal.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Constraining models of postglacial rebound using space geodesy: a detailed assessment of model ICE-5G (VM2) and its relatives [J].
Argus, Donald F. ;
Peltier, W. Richard .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 181 (02) :697-723
[2]   Isolating the PGR signal in the GRACE data: impact on mass balance estimates in Antarctica and Greenland [J].
Barletta, V. R. ;
Sabadini, R. ;
Bordoni, A. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 172 (01) :18-30
[3]  
Bevis M, 2009, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.HTTPS://D0L0RG/10.1029/2009GC002642
[4]   A first detailed look at the Greenland lithosphere and upper mantle, using Rayleigh wave tomography [J].
Darbyshire, FA ;
Larsen, TB ;
Mosegaard, K ;
Dahl-Jensen, T ;
Gudmundsson, O ;
Bach, T ;
Gregersen, S ;
Pedersen, HA ;
Hanka, W .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 158 (01) :267-286
[5]   PRELIMINARY REFERENCE EARTH MODEL [J].
DZIEWONSKI, AM ;
ANDERSON, DL .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1981, 25 (04) :297-356
[6]   Precise Gravimetric Surveys with the Field Absolute Gravimeter A-10 [J].
Falk, R. ;
Mueller, Ja. ;
Lux, N. ;
Wilmes, H. ;
Wziontek, H. .
GEODESY FOR PLANET EARTH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 IAG SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 136 :273-279
[7]   POSTGLACIAL SEA-LEVEL [J].
FARRELL, WE ;
CLARK, JA .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 46 (03) :647-667
[8]  
Greve R, 1997, J CLIMATE, V10, P901, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0901:AOAPTD>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Khan SA, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES, V115, P1