Patient and family/friend satisfaction in a sample of Jordanian Critical Care Units

被引:10
作者
Mosleh, S. [1 ]
Alja'afreh, M. [1 ]
Lee, A. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mutah Univ, Fac Nursing, Dept Adult Hlth Nursing, Al Karak 61710, Jordan
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Med Stat Team, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
关键词
Patient satisfaction; Family satisfaction; Quality of care; Critical care; Decision making process; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTENSIVE-CARE; FAMILY SATISFACTION; ILL PATIENTS; NEEDS; MEMBERS; ICU; QUESTIONNAIRE; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2015.04.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the validity of family members/friends as proxies by comparing perceptions of satisfaction with care and decision making between critically ill patients and their family/friends. Design: A comparative, descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting: Seven Critical Care Units across four public and military hospitals in the centre and southern regions of Jordan. Methods: A modified version of the Family Satisfaction-ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire was distributed to Critical Care Unit (CCU) patients before hospital discharge. In addition, up to two family members/close friends were also asked to complete the questionnaire. Results: A total of 213 patients (response rate 72%) and 246 family members/friends (response rate 79%) completed and returned the questionnaire. Although the majority of family members/friends and patients were satisfied with overall care, patients were generally significantly less satisfied (mean (SD) care subscale 75.6 (17.8) and 70.9 (17.3), respectively, (p = 0.005). When individual items were examined, significant differences in nursing care (family/friends 80.1 (20.7) versus patient 75.9 (22.2), p = 0.038) and inclusion in decision making (family/friends 53.9 (33.2) versus patient 62.0 (34.2), p=0.010) were found. Conclusion: The study showed a degree of congruence between patients and their family members/friends in relation to their satisfaction with the CCU experience. Thus, views of family/friends may serve as a proxy in assessing care and decision making processes of critically ill patients. Relevance to clinical practice: Appropriate training of the critical care team and provision of strategies to address the concerns of patients' families are needed to improve overall patient satisfaction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 374
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ahmad Muayyad M, 2004, Int J Nurs Pract, V10, P235, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00484.x
[2]  
Al-Hassan Musa Ali, 2004, Int J Nurs Pract, V10, P64
[3]   Family needs and involvement in the intensive care unit: a literature review [J].
Al-Mutair, Abbas Saleh ;
Plummer, Virginia ;
O'Brien, Anthony ;
Clerehan, Rosemary .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (13-14) :1805-1817
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
[5]   Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families - A multicenter study [J].
Azoulay, E ;
Pochard, F ;
Chevret, S ;
Lemaire, F ;
Mokhtari, M ;
Le Gall, JR ;
Dhainaut, JF ;
Schlemmer, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 163 (01) :135-139
[6]  
Baharoon S., 2014, J P atient Safety, V9, P12
[7]   Quality of life in patients with schizophrenia-comparison of self-report and proxy assessments [J].
Becchi, A ;
Rucci, P ;
Placentino, A ;
Neri, G ;
de Girolamo, G .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 39 (05) :397-401
[8]   Needs of relatives of critical care patients: perceptions of relatives, physicians and nurses [J].
Bijttebier, P ;
Vanoost, S ;
Delva, D ;
Ferdinande, P ;
Frans, E .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (01) :160-+
[9]   Gastrointestinal promotility drugs in the critical care setting: A systematic review of the evidence [J].
Booth, CM ;
Heyland, DK ;
Paterson, WG .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (07) :1429-1435
[10]   Unmet Needs of Family Members in the Medical Intensive Care Waiting Room [J].
Browning, Gloria ;
Warren, Nancy A. .
CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2006, 29 (01) :86-95